How Changes in the Mean Latency, Jitter Amplitude, and Jitter Frequency Impact Target Acquisition Performance

Interactive technologies require the user to frequently generate purposeful movements, where actions are guided towards targets. While delays between the movement onset and the corresponding update within the virtual space have been shown to impair target acquisition, the relative contribution of the individual latency parameters remains unclear. This article investigates how changes in latency, the moment-by-moment variability in the latency (jitter amplitude) and the rate of variability (jitter frequency), affect the speed and accuracy of target acquisition at different mean latencies. Experiment 1 explored changes in the mean latency and jitter amplitude. As the mean latency increased, we observed substantial impairments in completion time and accuracy, with increased variability in performance. There was also an interaction between the mean latency and jitter amplitude: although large jitter amplitudes caused a small completion time impairment, this effect decreased as the mean latency increased. Experiment 2 isolated the effect of the jitter by investigating changes in the jitter amplitude and jitter frequency at a fixed mean latency. Here, we observed completion time impairments from 67 ms amplitude and accuracy impairments from 134 ms amplitude. Like Experiment 1, the effect of the amplitude was small. Notably, we found no evidence that changes in the jitter frequency significantly influenced performance. Overall, increases in the mean latency contributed most to the impairment, disrupting acquisition speed and accuracy as it increased. Large jitter amplitudes also disrupted speed and accuracy, but this was a comparatively small effect that was mediated by the mean latency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3701984
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Sensor Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Changes in the Mean Latency, Jitter Amplitude, and Jitter Frequency Impact Target Acquisition Performance

Danaë Stanton Fraser, Iain D. Gilchrist, Andy Gower, Sam Beech et al.
3 citations
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
Geophysics and Sensor Technology
1.01
article

How Changes in the Mean Latency, Jitter Amplitude, and Jitter Frequency Impact Target Acquisition Performance

Danaë Stanton Fraser, Iain D. Gilchrist, Andy Gower, Sam Beech, Andy Corston-Petrie
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Interactive technologies require the user to frequently generate purposeful movements, where actions are guided towards targets. While delays between the movement onset and the corresponding update within the virtual space have been shown to impair target acquisition, the relative contribution of the individual latency parameters remains unclear. This article investigates how changes in latency, the moment-by-moment variability in the latency (jitter amplitude) and the rate of variability (jitter frequency), affect the speed and accuracy of target acquisition at different mean latencies. Experiment 1 explored changes in the mean latency and jitter amplitude. As the mean latency increased, we observed substantial impairments in completion time and accuracy, with increased variability in performance. There was also an interaction between the mean latency and jitter amplitude: although large jitter amplitudes caused a small completion time impairment, this effect decreased as the mean latency increased. Experiment 2 isolated the effect of the jitter by investigating changes in the jitter amplitude and jitter frequency at a fixed mean latency. Here, we observed completion time impairments from 67 ms amplitude and accuracy impairments from 134 ms amplitude. Like Experiment 1, the effect of the amplitude was small. Notably, we found no evidence that changes in the jitter frequency significantly influenced performance. Overall, increases in the mean latency contributed most to the impairment, disrupting acquisition speed and accuracy as it increased. Large jitter amplitudes also disrupted speed and accuracy, but this was a comparatively small effect that was mediated by the mean latency.

ACM Transactions on Applied PerceptionVol. 22(2)
BT Group (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Bristol (GB), University of Bath (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Geophysics and Sensor Technology
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.