On the Use of Different Sets of Variables for Solving Unsteady Inviscid Flows with an Implicit Discontinuous Galerkin Method

This article presents a comparison between the performance obtained by using a spatial discretization of the Euler equations based on a high-order discontinuous Galerkin (dG) method and different sets of variables. The sets of variables investigated are as follows: (1) conservative variables; (2) primitive variables based on pressure and temperature; (3) primitive variables based on the logarithms of pressure and temperature. The solution is advanced in time by using a linearly implicit high-order Rosenbrock-type scheme. The results obtained using the different sets are assessed across several canonical unsteady test cases, focusing on the accuracy, conservation properties and robustness of each discretization. In order to cover a wide range of physical flow conditions, the test-cases considered here are (1) the isentropic vortex convection, (2) the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability and (3) the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fluids
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9110248
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Use of Different Sets of Variables for Solving Unsteady Inviscid Flows with an Implicit Discontinuous Galerkin Method

Emanuele Carnevali, Alessandra Nigro, Luca Alberti, Emanuele Cammalleri
1 citations
Fluids
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
0.37
article

On the Use of Different Sets of Variables for Solving Unsteady Inviscid Flows with an Implicit Discontinuous Galerkin Method

Emanuele Carnevali, Alessandra Nigro, Luca Alberti, Emanuele Cammalleri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article presents a comparison between the performance obtained by using a spatial discretization of the Euler equations based on a high-order discontinuous Galerkin (dG) method and different sets of variables. The sets of variables investigated are as follows: (1) conservative variables; (2) primitive variables based on pressure and temperature; (3) primitive variables based on the logarithms of pressure and temperature. The solution is advanced in time by using a linearly implicit high-order Rosenbrock-type scheme. The results obtained using the different sets are assessed across several canonical unsteady test cases, focusing on the accuracy, conservation properties and robustness of each discretization. In order to cover a wide range of physical flow conditions, the test-cases considered here are (1) the isentropic vortex convection, (2) the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability and (3) the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability.

FluidsVol. 9(11)
Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the Use of Different Sets of Variables for Solving Unsteady Inviscid Flows with an Implicit Discontinuous Galerkin Method — Emanuele Carnevali, Alessandra Nigro, et al. · Fluids (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS