Nonnormative Communication and Metaphors of Silencing in Two Postcolonial Texts

Brian Friel’s Translations and Aminatta Forna’s Ancestor Stones both use a character with a speech impairment as a metaphorical representation of silencing and its limits under colonialism. When read purely as metaphors, as in the extensive body of criticism on Friel’s play, these characters offer competing visions of what is lost and what is not when precolonial cultures and languages are suppressed. However, a purely metaphorical reading reinforces both the broad tendency to use disability to represent other forms of oppression and the specific tendency to use communication disabilities to represent the supposed silencing of marginalized people, both of which reaffirm ableist conceptions of disability as deficiency and pull our attention away from the individuality of the disabled characters. A closer reading of each text shows the flaws in a strictly metaphorical reading, as both characters complicate the idea that their inability to vocalize is a form of silence, as they demonstrate that people with communication disabilities can have much to tell people and many ways of doing so. This poses a challenge to the overreliance on voice and voicelessness as metaphors in discussions of marginalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2024.35
Primary Topic
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonnormative Communication and Metaphors of Silencing in Two Postcolonial Texts

Tracy A. Stephens
Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
article

Nonnormative Communication and Metaphors of Silencing in Two Postcolonial Texts

Tracy A. Stephens
article en

Abstract

Brian Friel’s Translations and Aminatta Forna’s Ancestor Stones both use a character with a speech impairment as a metaphorical representation of silencing and its limits under colonialism. When read purely as metaphors, as in the extensive body of criticism on Friel’s play, these characters offer competing visions of what is lost and what is not when precolonial cultures and languages are suppressed. However, a purely metaphorical reading reinforces both the broad tendency to use disability to represent other forms of oppression and the specific tendency to use communication disabilities to represent the supposed silencing of marginalized people, both of which reaffirm ableist conceptions of disability as deficiency and pull our attention away from the individuality of the disabled characters. A closer reading of each text shows the flaws in a strictly metaphorical reading, as both characters complicate the idea that their inability to vocalize is a form of silence, as they demonstrate that people with communication disabilities can have much to tell people and many ways of doing so. This poses a challenge to the overreliance on voice and voicelessness as metaphors in discussions of marginalization.

Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability StudiesVol. 18(4)
Queens University of Charlotte (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nonnormative Communication and Metaphors of Silencing in Two Postcolonial Texts — Tracy A. Stephens · Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS