Pressure Monitoring of Disposal Reservoirs in North‐Central Oklahoma: Implications for Seismicity and Geostorage

Abstract Disposal of industrial wastewater and activities such as underground sequestration depend upon pressure conditions within deep geologic reservoirs. Sometimes, injection and storage are associated with induced seismicity, suggested to result from reservoir compartmentalization, leakage into faults, or other mechanisms in the subsurface. To understand subsurface pressure conditions within a major regional disposal reservoir, the Arbuckle Group of Oklahoma, we monitored the water levels in 15 inactive injection wells. The wells were monitored at 30‐s intervals, with eight wells monitored since September 2016, and an additional seven from July 2017. All the wells were monitored until early March 2020. Since 2016, hydraulic head decreased in 13 of the 15 wells, proportional to near‐borehole fluid pressure even considering decreasing regional injection volumes during this period. The well pressures respond to three types of perturbations: (i) gravitational fluctuations (a.k.a. solid‐earth tides) (ii) distal and proximal earthquakes, and (iii) injections into nearby wells. Parameterization of tidal responses illustrates that the near wellbore environments have negative fluid flux (i.e., are leaking). Earthquakes cause differing pressure responses from well to well, with some highly sensitive to proximal events, some to distal events, and some apparently insensitive. Injections have variable impacts in some cases masking tidal and earthquake pressure signals. Collectively, there appears to be a threshold injection rate above which well pressure becomes less sensitive to the volume of injections within 15 km. Multi‐scale geological structure and temporal permeability changes are likely controlling the pressure field, indicating leakage of fluids across the system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jb029200
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pressure Monitoring of Disposal Reservoirs in North‐Central Oklahoma: Implications for Seismicity and Geostorage

Fnu Suriamin, Kyle E. Murray, P. Ogwari, Nicholas W. Hayman et al.
3 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
1.60
article

Pressure Monitoring of Disposal Reservoirs in North‐Central Oklahoma: Implications for Seismicity and Geostorage

Fnu Suriamin, Kyle E. Murray, P. Ogwari, Nicholas W. Hayman, Benjamin Allen, J. I. Walter
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Disposal of industrial wastewater and activities such as underground sequestration depend upon pressure conditions within deep geologic reservoirs. Sometimes, injection and storage are associated with induced seismicity, suggested to result from reservoir compartmentalization, leakage into faults, or other mechanisms in the subsurface. To understand subsurface pressure conditions within a major regional disposal reservoir, the Arbuckle Group of Oklahoma, we monitored the water levels in 15 inactive injection wells. The wells were monitored at 30‐s intervals, with eight wells monitored since September 2016, and an additional seven from July 2017. All the wells were monitored until early March 2020. Since 2016, hydraulic head decreased in 13 of the 15 wells, proportional to near‐borehole fluid pressure even considering decreasing regional injection volumes during this period. The well pressures respond to three types of perturbations: (i) gravitational fluctuations (a.k.a. solid‐earth tides) (ii) distal and proximal earthquakes, and (iii) injections into nearby wells. Parameterization of tidal responses illustrates that the near wellbore environments have negative fluid flux (i.e., are leaking). Earthquakes cause differing pressure responses from well to well, with some highly sensitive to proximal events, some to distal events, and some apparently insensitive. Injections have variable impacts in some cases masking tidal and earthquake pressure signals. Collectively, there appears to be a threshold injection rate above which well pressure becomes less sensitive to the volume of injections within 15 km. Multi‐scale geological structure and temporal permeability changes are likely controlling the pressure field, indicating leakage of fluids across the system.

Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthVol. 129(10)
United States Geological Survey (US), Oklahoma Biological Survey (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.