Rapid Campimetry in glaucoma – correspondence with standard perimetry and OCT

The Rapid Campimetry (RC), a kinetic visual field test proved to reliably detect visual field defects within the central 10° degrees, the most crucial part for visual acuity and quality of life, affected even at very early stages of glaucoma, within a short measurement epoch, ~ 1 min. This study aims to further investigate RC correspondence with standard tests in glaucoma, namely standard automated perimetry (SAP) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) within 10° of visual field (VF). For this purpose, we included 41 participants, [21 glaucoma (GLA, mean age: 65.9 ± 12.4; 12 preperimetric eyes and 11 with VF defects) and 20 healthy controls (HC; mean age: 65.0 ± 10.3); 20 eyes]. At first, we compared the rate of detection/exclusion of VF defects in RC vs. SAP. Then, for those with VF defects (11 eyes), we investigated the 68-pointwise correspondence of 10 - 2 layout of RC and SAP. For functional and structural (SF) correspondence, pointwise correspondence of RC, SAP vs. OCT<sub>macula</sub> [ macular ganglion cell thickness (GCL)] was also performed. Further, we compared sector-based correspondence of RC, SAP vs. OCT<sub>macula</sub> accounting for GCL displacement at the fovea as well as sector-based correspondence with OCT<sub>disc</sub> [peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (pRNFL)]. Agreement estimates were reported along with Cohen Kappa ([Formula: see text]) statistic. For overall performance, RC and SAP showed 100% agreement ([Formula: see text]) for the exclusion of VF defects (HC and preperimetric GLA) and for detection of VF defects [11 eyes of 9 GLA, ([Formula: see text]]. Further, RC outperformed SAP in detection of arcuate scotomas, 7 vs. 5, respectively. Pointwise correspondence of VF defects (11 eyes), RC-SAP agreement reached 90% accuracy ([Formula: see text]). For SF correspondence, RC [SAP] showed 62% [69%] pointwise agreement with OCT<sub>macula</sub>, ([Formula: see text]). For macular sector-based correspondence, SF correspondence improved and reached 83% [83%] agreement, ([Formula: see text]). For OCT<sub>disc</sub> sector-based analysis, SF correspondence was highest, 100% [100%] agreement, ([Formula: see text]). Rapid Campimetry gave reproducible results in comparison to SAP and OCT with high potential as a screening VF method given its short testing duration, ~ 1 min in screening mode, and compatibility with telemedicine technologies upon future optimization and automation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75037-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rapid Campimetry in glaucoma – correspondence with standard perimetry and OCT

Fabian Müller, Nidele Djouoma, Friedrich Hoffmann, Khaldoon O. Al-Nosairy et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
1.08
article

Rapid Campimetry in glaucoma – correspondence with standard perimetry and OCT

Fabian Müller, Nidele Djouoma, Friedrich Hoffmann, Khaldoon O. Al-Nosairy, Michael B. Hoffmann, Francie H. Stolle, Hagen Thieme
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The Rapid Campimetry (RC), a kinetic visual field test proved to reliably detect visual field defects within the central 10° degrees, the most crucial part for visual acuity and quality of life, affected even at very early stages of glaucoma, within a short measurement epoch, ~ 1 min. This study aims to further investigate RC correspondence with standard tests in glaucoma, namely standard automated perimetry (SAP) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) within 10° of visual field (VF). For this purpose, we included 41 participants, [21 glaucoma (GLA, mean age: 65.9 ± 12.4; 12 preperimetric eyes and 11 with VF defects) and 20 healthy controls (HC; mean age: 65.0 ± 10.3); 20 eyes]. At first, we compared the rate of detection/exclusion of VF defects in RC vs. SAP. Then, for those with VF defects (11 eyes), we investigated the 68-pointwise correspondence of 10 - 2 layout of RC and SAP. For functional and structural (SF) correspondence, pointwise correspondence of RC, SAP vs. OCT<sub>macula</sub> [ macular ganglion cell thickness (GCL)] was also performed. Further, we compared sector-based correspondence of RC, SAP vs. OCT<sub>macula</sub> accounting for GCL displacement at the fovea as well as sector-based correspondence with OCT<sub>disc</sub> [peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (pRNFL)]. Agreement estimates were reported along with Cohen Kappa ([Formula: see text]) statistic. For overall performance, RC and SAP showed 100% agreement ([Formula: see text]) for the exclusion of VF defects (HC and preperimetric GLA) and for detection of VF defects [11 eyes of 9 GLA, ([Formula: see text]]. Further, RC outperformed SAP in detection of arcuate scotomas, 7 vs. 5, respectively. Pointwise correspondence of VF defects (11 eyes), RC-SAP agreement reached 90% accuracy ([Formula: see text]). For SF correspondence, RC [SAP] showed 62% [69%] pointwise agreement with OCT<sub>macula</sub>, ([Formula: see text]). For macular sector-based correspondence, SF correspondence improved and reached 83% [83%] agreement, ([Formula: see text]). For OCT<sub>disc</sub> sector-based analysis, SF correspondence was highest, 100% [100%] agreement, ([Formula: see text]). Rapid Campimetry gave reproducible results in comparison to SAP and OCT with high potential as a screening VF method given its short testing duration, ~ 1 min in screening mode, and compatibility with telemedicine technologies upon future optimization and automation.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.