Unraveling the Impacts of Submesoscale Thermal and Current Feedbacks on the Low-Level Winds and Oceanic Submesoscale Currents

Abstract In this study, high-resolution coupled ocean–atmosphere simulations are performed over the Gulf Stream to investigate the influence of submesoscale [ O (10) km] thermal feedback (TFB) and current feedback (CFB) on the low-level atmosphere and the oceanic submesoscale kinetic energy (SKE). At the submesoscale, TFB and CFB exhibit constructive and destructive effects on wind and surface stress, making this a more complex problem than for the mesoscale [ O (100) km]. This coinfluence alters classical coupling coefficients, posing a challenge to isolate individual coupling mechanisms. Here, the feedbacks are isolated separately by removing their imprint on the air–sea coupling fields in dedicated simulations. Both submesoscale TFB and CFB lead to a damping of the SKE. CFB causes eddy killing by drag friction between currents and the atmosphere. However, while eddy killing should be more efficient than its mesoscale counterpart due to a weaker wind response (less re-energization), its effect is hampered by an energization from TFB and by the highly transient nature of submesoscale flow, resulting in a modest 10% reduction in SKE. TFB also contributes to a reduction of SKE, mainly by causing a potential energy sink, associated with turbulent heat fluxes, especially at scales < 10 km. The potential energy sink affects SKE through a decrease of baroclinic energy conversion although this is slightly modulated by an increase in Ekman pumping by submesoscale CFB. Our results emphasize the importance of considering both TFB and CFB at the submesoscale and highlight the limitations of mesoscale CFB parameterizations for submesoscale applications. Future parameterizations should be scale-aware and account for both TFB and CFB effects on momentum and heat fluxes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physical Oceanography
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-24-0097.1
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unraveling the Impacts of Submesoscale Thermal and Current Feedbacks on the Low-Level Winds and Oceanic Submesoscale Currents

Carlos Conejero, Igor Uchoa, Patrick Marchesiello, Lionel Renault et al.
4 citations
Journal of Physical Oceanography
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
1.92
article

Unraveling the Impacts of Submesoscale Thermal and Current Feedbacks on the Low-Level Winds and Oceanic Submesoscale Currents

Carlos Conejero, Igor Uchoa, Patrick Marchesiello, Lionel Renault, Marcela Contreras, Jacob Wenegrat
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this study, high-resolution coupled ocean–atmosphere simulations are performed over the Gulf Stream to investigate the influence of submesoscale [ O (10) km] thermal feedback (TFB) and current feedback (CFB) on the low-level atmosphere and the oceanic submesoscale kinetic energy (SKE). At the submesoscale, TFB and CFB exhibit constructive and destructive effects on wind and surface stress, making this a more complex problem than for the mesoscale [ O (100) km]. This coinfluence alters classical coupling coefficients, posing a challenge to isolate individual coupling mechanisms. Here, the feedbacks are isolated separately by removing their imprint on the air–sea coupling fields in dedicated simulations. Both submesoscale TFB and CFB lead to a damping of the SKE. CFB causes eddy killing by drag friction between currents and the atmosphere. However, while eddy killing should be more efficient than its mesoscale counterpart due to a weaker wind response (less re-energization), its effect is hampered by an energization from TFB and by the highly transient nature of submesoscale flow, resulting in a modest 10% reduction in SKE. TFB also contributes to a reduction of SKE, mainly by causing a potential energy sink, associated with turbulent heat fluxes, especially at scales < 10 km. The potential energy sink affects SKE through a decrease of baroclinic energy conversion although this is slightly modulated by an increase in Ekman pumping by submesoscale CFB. Our results emphasize the importance of considering both TFB and CFB at the submesoscale and highlight the limitations of mesoscale CFB parameterizations for submesoscale applications. Future parameterizations should be scale-aware and account for both TFB and CFB effects on momentum and heat fluxes.

Journal of Physical OceanographyVol. 54(12)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Laboratoire d’Études en Géophysique et Océanographie Spatiales (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
1.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.