The Environmental Impact of a High-Altitude Medical Research Expedition

Joyce, Kelsey E., Catherine A. Campbell, Arthur R. Bradwell, Samuel J.E. Lucas, Christopher T. Lewis, Rebekah A.I. Lucas, and Mark Edsell; for the Birmingham Medical Research Expeditionary Society (BMRES). The environmental impact of a high-altitude medical research expedition. <i>High Alt Med Biol.</i> 26:140-147, 2025. <b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Scientists must begin examining the environmental cost(s) of their research. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a component of the environmental impact of a high-altitude medical research expedition by totaling the carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions calculated from as many direct and indirect sources as possible. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Eighteen individuals flew from London to Bagdogra (via Delhi), and then drove onward to Lachung (via Gangtok) where they began their ascent on foot to 4,800 m (Kanchenjunga National Park, Sikkim). Several research experiments were conducted throughout the expedition, which required use of a laboratory centrifuge, solid CO<sub>2</sub> (specimen storage), rechargeable laptop computers and battery-powered oximeters. International Civil Aviation Organization calculators estimated aviation CO<sub>2</sub> production. Land emissions were calculated for <i>Mahindra</i> vehicles. Solid waste was weighed and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions estimated for its incineration. <b><i>Results</i>:</b> Total CO<sub>2</sub> emissions equated to ∼16.7 tonnes from the following sources: air and land transportation of expedition team (87.3%); sublimation and transportation of solid CO<sub>2</sub> (7.7%), waste incineration (0.58%), generator transportation and gasoline (12 l) combustion (0.48%), and battery transportation (3.3%). <b><i>Conclusions</i>:</b> Air travel contributed the most to the overall environmental cost of the research expedition. Further investigation is required to contextualize these findings in relation to lab-based alternative(s).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
High Altitude Medicine & Biology
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/ham.2024.0049
Primary Topic
High Altitude and Hypoxia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Environmental Impact of a High-Altitude Medical Research Expedition

Mark Edsell, Catherine Campbell, Christopher Lewis, Rebekah A. I. Lucas et al.
High Altitude Medicine & Biology
High Altitude and Hypoxia
article

The Environmental Impact of a High-Altitude Medical Research Expedition

Mark Edsell, Catherine Campbell, Christopher Lewis, Rebekah A. I. Lucas, A.R. Bradwell, Samuel J. E. Lucas, Kelsey Elizabeth Joyce
article en

Abstract

Joyce, Kelsey E., Catherine A. Campbell, Arthur R. Bradwell, Samuel J.E. Lucas, Christopher T. Lewis, Rebekah A.I. Lucas, and Mark Edsell; for the Birmingham Medical Research Expeditionary Society (BMRES). The environmental impact of a high-altitude medical research expedition. <i>High Alt Med Biol.</i> 26:140-147, 2025. <b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Scientists must begin examining the environmental cost(s) of their research. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a component of the environmental impact of a high-altitude medical research expedition by totaling the carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions calculated from as many direct and indirect sources as possible. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Eighteen individuals flew from London to Bagdogra (via Delhi), and then drove onward to Lachung (via Gangtok) where they began their ascent on foot to 4,800 m (Kanchenjunga National Park, Sikkim). Several research experiments were conducted throughout the expedition, which required use of a laboratory centrifuge, solid CO<sub>2</sub> (specimen storage), rechargeable laptop computers and battery-powered oximeters. International Civil Aviation Organization calculators estimated aviation CO<sub>2</sub> production. Land emissions were calculated for <i>Mahindra</i> vehicles. Solid waste was weighed and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions estimated for its incineration. <b><i>Results</i>:</b> Total CO<sub>2</sub> emissions equated to ∼16.7 tonnes from the following sources: air and land transportation of expedition team (87.3%); sublimation and transportation of solid CO<sub>2</sub> (7.7%), waste incineration (0.58%), generator transportation and gasoline (12 l) combustion (0.48%), and battery transportation (3.3%). <b><i>Conclusions</i>:</b> Air travel contributed the most to the overall environmental cost of the research expedition. Further investigation is required to contextualize these findings in relation to lab-based alternative(s).

High Altitude Medicine & BiologyVol. 26(2)
Royal Brompton Hospital (GB), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Nelson Hospital (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
High Altitude and Hypoxia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.