Towards a Better Uncertainty Quantification in Automated Valuation Models

Abstract This study introduces a novel framework for quantifying prediction uncertainty in automated valuation models (AVMs), crucial tools in modern real estate finance. While non-linear AVMs excel in predictive performance, their limited methods for assessing prediction uncertainty reduces reliability and practical utility. We address this gap by proposing an approach for quantifying the uncertainty associated with predicted house prices and by introducing a model-specific AVM uncertainty estimate (AVMU) for AVM comparisons. Using a dataset of 51,747 historical apartment transactions in Oslo, Norway, we train three AVMs (XGBoost, random forest, support vector machine) to predict sales prices. Thereafter, we develop three base uncertainty estimators (direct loss estimation, bootstrap ensemble, quantile regression) and three meta estimators (average regressor, voting regressor, stacked generalization) for uncertainty quantification. Conformal calibration aligns the outputted uncertainty estimates from the six estimators with standard deviations of corresponding prediction errors. Having strong positive correlations with observed absolute prediction errors, the calibrated uncertainty estimators are shown to effectively capture prediction uncertainty. While the direct loss estimation excels among base estimators, the voting regressor and stacked generalization meta estimators consistently outperform it. Furthermore, by using the AVMU estimate from the stacked generalization meta estimator we can successfully identify the best-performing AVM for three separate apartment portfolios without knowing true sales prices. This alignment of the mean estimated prediction uncertainty with observed deviations underlines the utility of pre-factual AVMU estimates for model comparisons. In conclusion, our framework helps bridge prediction accuracy and uncertainty for AVMs, enhancing their reliability and supporting informed decision making for stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-024-10002-7
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a Better Uncertainty Quantification in Automated Valuation Models

Arild Brandrud Næss, Are Oust, Arne Johan Pollestad
7 citations
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
3.77
article

Towards a Better Uncertainty Quantification in Automated Valuation Models

Arild Brandrud Næss, Are Oust, Arne Johan Pollestad
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study introduces a novel framework for quantifying prediction uncertainty in automated valuation models (AVMs), crucial tools in modern real estate finance. While non-linear AVMs excel in predictive performance, their limited methods for assessing prediction uncertainty reduces reliability and practical utility. We address this gap by proposing an approach for quantifying the uncertainty associated with predicted house prices and by introducing a model-specific AVM uncertainty estimate (AVMU) for AVM comparisons. Using a dataset of 51,747 historical apartment transactions in Oslo, Norway, we train three AVMs (XGBoost, random forest, support vector machine) to predict sales prices. Thereafter, we develop three base uncertainty estimators (direct loss estimation, bootstrap ensemble, quantile regression) and three meta estimators (average regressor, voting regressor, stacked generalization) for uncertainty quantification. Conformal calibration aligns the outputted uncertainty estimates from the six estimators with standard deviations of corresponding prediction errors. Having strong positive correlations with observed absolute prediction errors, the calibrated uncertainty estimators are shown to effectively capture prediction uncertainty. While the direct loss estimation excels among base estimators, the voting regressor and stacked generalization meta estimators consistently outperform it. Furthermore, by using the AVMU estimate from the stacked generalization meta estimator we can successfully identify the best-performing AVM for three separate apartment portfolios without knowing true sales prices. This alignment of the mean estimated prediction uncertainty with observed deviations underlines the utility of pre-factual AVMU estimates for model comparisons. In conclusion, our framework helps bridge prediction accuracy and uncertainty for AVMs, enhancing their reliability and supporting informed decision making for stakeholders.

The Journal of Real Estate Finance and EconomicsVol. 72(3)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, Norges Forskningsråd, St. Olavs Hospital Universitetssykehuset i Trondheim
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
3.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.