Myth of the 'muse': a History of the Gender Roles Conceptualised in Art
The muse has been historically defined as a source of divine inspiration to the artist, a passive and voiceless object art is made in reflection to but not about. The dynamic is almost always gendered with the female counterpart of the muse being frequently left silent. She takes on a sexualised role, posing nude, as often the relationship between muse and artist extends to romantic one. An erotised and romanticised version of womanhood litters nude paintings of the past, highlighting how the role frequently stripped women of their identity as they were portrayed through the eyes of the male artist. However, there are artists who have challenged these assumptions. Tracing the life of artist Lee Miller and the work of Shigeyuki Kihara reveals how the binaries between the roles of artist and muse are not as rigid as previously thought but are influenced by societal constructs limiting how we perceive and use the role of the muse.
Authors
- Mike Gane
Publication Details
- Journal
- Plurality.
- Published
- 2024-10-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2218/plurality.10079
- Primary Topic
- Architecture and Art History Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00