Prediction of binding energy using machine learning approach

The liquid drop model is an empirical hypothesis established on the idea that nuclei can be thought of as incompressible liquid droplets. The AME2020 dataset was used in this work to determine binding energy using a semi-empirical mass formula and compare it with binding energies predicted by a machine learning algorithm. Random forest regressor, MLPRegressor, and XGBoost models were employed. In terms of accuracy, root mean square error, and mean absolute error, machine learning models performed better than the semi-empirical mass formula. Compared to RFR, XGBoost, and SEMF, MLPRegressor performed better in predicting binding energies for lighter nuclei. Using estimated binding energies, nuclear masses were computed, and it was shown that all three models adequately predicted nuclear masses with minimal error. This finding highlights how machine learning can be applied to nuclear physics to predict various nuclei’s properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIP Advances
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0230425
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of binding energy using machine learning approach

Bishnu Pandey, Narayan Prasad Adhikari, Muskan Jalan, Subash Giri et al.
1 citations
AIP Advances
Machine Learning in Materials Science
0.12
article

Prediction of binding energy using machine learning approach

Bishnu Pandey, Narayan Prasad Adhikari, Muskan Jalan, Subash Giri, Ashok Chaudhary, Rajan Dev Pant
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The liquid drop model is an empirical hypothesis established on the idea that nuclei can be thought of as incompressible liquid droplets. The AME2020 dataset was used in this work to determine binding energy using a semi-empirical mass formula and compare it with binding energies predicted by a machine learning algorithm. Random forest regressor, MLPRegressor, and XGBoost models were employed. In terms of accuracy, root mean square error, and mean absolute error, machine learning models performed better than the semi-empirical mass formula. Compared to RFR, XGBoost, and SEMF, MLPRegressor performed better in predicting binding energies for lighter nuclei. Using estimated binding energies, nuclear masses were computed, and it was shown that all three models adequately predicted nuclear masses with minimal error. This finding highlights how machine learning can be applied to nuclear physics to predict various nuclei’s properties.

AIP AdvancesVol. 14(10)
Tribhuvan University (NP)
Tribhuvan University, Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
0.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.