Pitfalls in Machine Learning for Computer Security

With the growing processing power of computing systems and the increasing availability of massive datasets, machine learning algorithms have led to major breakthroughs in many different areas. This development has influenced computer security, spawning a series of work on learning-based security systems, such as for malware detection, vulnerability discovery, and binary code analysis. Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance and render learning-based systems potentially unsuitable for security tasks and practical deployment. In this paper, we look at this problem with critical eyes. First, we identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We conduct a study of 30 papers from top-tier security conferences within the past 10 years, confirming that these pitfalls are widespread in the current security literature. In an empirical analysis, we further demonstrate how individual pitfalls can lead to unrealistic performance and interpretations, obstructing the understanding of the security problem at hand. As a remedy, we propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible. Furthermore, we identify open problems when applying machine learning in security and provide directions for further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications of the ACM
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3643456
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pitfalls in Machine Learning for Computer Security

Daniel J. Arp, Lorenzo Cavallaro, Christian Wressnegger, Konrad Rieck et al.
2 citations
Communications of the ACM
Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
0.70
article

Pitfalls in Machine Learning for Computer Security

Daniel J. Arp, Lorenzo Cavallaro, Christian Wressnegger, Konrad Rieck, Alexander Warnecke, Fabio Pierazzi, Erwin Quiring, Feargus Pendlebury
article en
2 citations

Abstract

With the growing processing power of computing systems and the increasing availability of massive datasets, machine learning algorithms have led to major breakthroughs in many different areas. This development has influenced computer security, spawning a series of work on learning-based security systems, such as for malware detection, vulnerability discovery, and binary code analysis. Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance and render learning-based systems potentially unsuitable for security tasks and practical deployment. In this paper, we look at this problem with critical eyes. First, we identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We conduct a study of 30 papers from top-tier security conferences within the past 10 years, confirming that these pitfalls are widespread in the current security literature. In an empirical analysis, we further demonstrate how individual pitfalls can lead to unrealistic performance and interpretations, obstructing the understanding of the security problem at hand. As a remedy, we propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible. Furthermore, we identify open problems when applying machine learning in security and provide directions for further research.

Communications of the ACMVol. 67(11)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), International Computer Science Institute (US), King's College London (GB), Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data (DE), University College London (GB), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
0.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.