Importance of Interface Variables for Closed-Loop Circuit EMC Co-Simulation Using WR Method

This article highlights the importance of interface variables (IVs) for closed-loop co-simulating power converter controllers and electrical circuits using waveform relaxation (WR). The method enhances co-simulation performance and stability by adjusting relaxation parameters in parallel with the behavioral source. Testing is conducted on a buck converter circuit with an input voltage ranging from 4 to 6 V and an output voltage of 3.3 V. Comparative analysis with conventional WR indicates a voltage difference of less than 1.8% between direct and measured values after 24 iterations and 38.25 s elapsed time. An assessment of the suitability of this method to evaluate the conducted electromagnetic immunity of the converter is also provided. These results highlight the proposed method’s ability to achieve faster and more accurate convergence compared to traditional WR methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/emceurope59828.2024.10722395
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Importance of Interface Variables for Closed-Loop Circuit EMC Co-Simulation Using WR Method

Md Moktarul Alam, Mohsen Koohestani, Richard Perdriau, Mohammed Ramdani
Electromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
article

Importance of Interface Variables for Closed-Loop Circuit EMC Co-Simulation Using WR Method

Md Moktarul Alam, Mohsen Koohestani, Richard Perdriau, Mohammed Ramdani
article en

Abstract

This article highlights the importance of interface variables (IVs) for closed-loop co-simulating power converter controllers and electrical circuits using waveform relaxation (WR). The method enhances co-simulation performance and stability by adjusting relaxation parameters in parallel with the behavioral source. Testing is conducted on a buck converter circuit with an input voltage ranging from 4 to 6 V and an output voltage of 3.3 V. Comparative analysis with conventional WR indicates a voltage difference of less than 1.8% between direct and measured values after 24 iterations and 38.25 s elapsed time. An assessment of the suitability of this method to evaluate the conducted electromagnetic immunity of the converter is also provided. These results highlight the proposed method’s ability to achieve faster and more accurate convergence compared to traditional WR methods.

École Supérieure d'Électronique de l'Ouest (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Electromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.