A New Benchmark Database and Objective Metric for Light Field Image Quality Evaluation

Light Field Image (LFI) records both angular and spatial information and provides immersive experiences for observers by rendering a scene from multiple perspectives. To cope with the resolution limitations of capture hardware, LFI angular reconstruction and spatial super-resolution are two widely-used methods, but they can also induce some special types of distortions, especially when two methods are adopted in combination. To this end, new challenges have been brought in assessing the quality of these distorted LFIs. In this paper, firstly, we conduct subjective experiments to evaluate the distorted LFI quality and present a novel perceptual quality assessment database with the associated subjective quality scores. Specifically, the proposed database focuses on the distortions introduced by deep learning-based LFI angular reconstruction and spatial super-resolution methods, individually and multiplely. Besides, in the case of multiple distortions, the adoption order of two distortions is taken into consideration. Further, our database presents three types of LFIs that suffer from distortions: real-world, dense synthesis, and sparse synthesis. As a result, the quality of distorted LFIs was subjectively assessed by 32 valid observers using the Pairwise Comparison (PC) protocol. Secondly, we develop a novel objective No-Reference (NR) metric for LFI quality evaluation, based on the features extracted from spatial gradients, angular-spatial statistics, and binocular disparity. Finally, a benchmark of the proposed metric and numerous state-of-the-art quality assessment metrics on the proposed database is presented. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed metric over most existing metrics in various aspects. The proposed database and metric will be publicly available at <uri xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://github.com/ZhengyuZhang96/IETR-LFI</uri>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tcsvt.2024.3486336
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Color Science and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A New Benchmark Database and Objective Metric for Light Field Image Quality Evaluation

Luce Morin, Jinjia Zhou, Lu Zhang, Zhengyu Zhang et al.
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
Color Science and Applications
0.34
article

A New Benchmark Database and Objective Metric for Light Field Image Quality Evaluation

Luce Morin, Jinjia Zhou, Lu Zhang, Zhengyu Zhang, Shishun Tian
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Light Field Image (LFI) records both angular and spatial information and provides immersive experiences for observers by rendering a scene from multiple perspectives. To cope with the resolution limitations of capture hardware, LFI angular reconstruction and spatial super-resolution are two widely-used methods, but they can also induce some special types of distortions, especially when two methods are adopted in combination. To this end, new challenges have been brought in assessing the quality of these distorted LFIs. In this paper, firstly, we conduct subjective experiments to evaluate the distorted LFI quality and present a novel perceptual quality assessment database with the associated subjective quality scores. Specifically, the proposed database focuses on the distortions introduced by deep learning-based LFI angular reconstruction and spatial super-resolution methods, individually and multiplely. Besides, in the case of multiple distortions, the adoption order of two distortions is taken into consideration. Further, our database presents three types of LFIs that suffer from distortions: real-world, dense synthesis, and sparse synthesis. As a result, the quality of distorted LFIs was subjectively assessed by 32 valid observers using the Pairwise Comparison (PC) protocol. Secondly, we develop a novel objective No-Reference (NR) metric for LFI quality evaluation, based on the features extracted from spatial gradients, angular-spatial statistics, and binocular disparity. Finally, a benchmark of the proposed metric and numerous state-of-the-art quality assessment metrics on the proposed database is presented. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed metric over most existing metrics in various aspects. The proposed database and metric will be publicly available at <uri xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://github.com/ZhengyuZhang96/IETR-LFI</uri>.

IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video TechnologyVol. 35(3)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Shenzhen University (CN), Hosei University (JP), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Rennes (FR), Guangzhou University (CN), Institut d'Électronique et des Technologies du numéRique (FR), Université de Rennes (FR)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Color Science and Applications
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.