Comparative Analysis of Compiler Efficiency: Energy Consumption Metrics in High-Performance Computing Domains

This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of compiler efficiency, with a focus on energy consumption metrics across diverse domains of high-performance computing. By rigorously evaluating the performance of GCC, Clang, and ICC, the research aims to elucidate which compilers excel in specific areas, thereby providing valuable insights for the strategic selection of these tools based on the unique requirements of various computational tasks. The findings reveal that, among the total energy consumed during the computations, GCC accounted for 33.23%, Clang for 36.01%, and ICC for 30.76%. Notably, ICC demonstrated superior energy efficiency, being 7.43% more efficient than GCC, while Clang was 8.35% less efficient. These results underscore the critical importance of selecting the appropriate compiler to optimize energy efficiency in high-performance computing environments.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5753/sscad.2024.244771
Primary Topic
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Compiler Efficiency: Energy Consumption Metrics in High-Performance Computing Domains

Luan Siqueira, Terence Rodrigues, Erick Damasceno, Marcos Amarís et al.
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
article

Comparative Analysis of Compiler Efficiency: Energy Consumption Metrics in High-Performance Computing Domains

Luan Siqueira, Terence Rodrigues, Erick Damasceno, Marcos Amarís, Fellipe Queiroz
article en

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of compiler efficiency, with a focus on energy consumption metrics across diverse domains of high-performance computing. By rigorously evaluating the performance of GCC, Clang, and ICC, the research aims to elucidate which compilers excel in specific areas, thereby providing valuable insights for the strategic selection of these tools based on the unique requirements of various computational tasks. The findings reveal that, among the total energy consumed during the computations, GCC accounted for 33.23%, Clang for 36.01%, and ICC for 30.76%. Notably, ICC demonstrated superior energy efficiency, being 7.43% more efficient than GCC, while Clang was 8.35% less efficient. These results underscore the critical importance of selecting the appropriate compiler to optimize energy efficiency in high-performance computing environments.

Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Compiler Efficiency: Energy Consumption Metrics in High-Performance Computing Domains — Luan Siqueira, Terence Rodrigues, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS