Common Media Holding Companies and the Uniqueness of Business Press Content

ABSTRACT We examine how common media holding companies impact the uniqueness of business press content. Consistent with common media holding companies reducing the diversity of perspectives among journalists, we find that media outlets are more likely to cover the same earnings announcement and utilize more similar tone and content when they belong to a common holding company. We provide evidence that these effects are enhanced by outlet reach and economic incentives to share content. Finally, we provide evidence consistent with coverage by common media holding companies impeding price formation. Overall, our findings suggest that content within common media holding companies is less diverse and that this may have negative implications for markets. Data Availability: Data are available from the sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: M40; M41; M49; G10; G14; L82.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Accounting Review
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2023-0191
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Financial Reporting and XBRL
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Common Media Holding Companies and the Uniqueness of Business Press Content

Fengyun Sun, Kenneth J. Merkley, Brady J. Twedt, Joseph Pacelli
3 citations
The Accounting Review
Financial Reporting and XBRL
1.59
article

Common Media Holding Companies and the Uniqueness of Business Press Content

Fengyun Sun, Kenneth J. Merkley, Brady J. Twedt, Joseph Pacelli
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT We examine how common media holding companies impact the uniqueness of business press content. Consistent with common media holding companies reducing the diversity of perspectives among journalists, we find that media outlets are more likely to cover the same earnings announcement and utilize more similar tone and content when they belong to a common holding company. We provide evidence that these effects are enhanced by outlet reach and economic incentives to share content. Finally, we provide evidence consistent with coverage by common media holding companies impeding price formation. Overall, our findings suggest that content within common media holding companies is less diverse and that this may have negative implications for markets. Data Availability: Data are available from the sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: M40; M41; M49; G10; G14; L82.

The Accounting ReviewVol. 100(1)
Binghamton University (US), Mitchell Institute (US), Harvard University Press (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Financial Reporting and XBRL
1.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.