Relationships between capnogram parameters by mainstream and sidestream techniques at different breathing frequencies

Capnography, routinely used in operating rooms and intensive care units, reveals essential information on lung ventilation and ventilation-perfusion matching. Mainstream capnography directly measures CO<sub>2</sub> in the breathing circuit for accurate analysis and is considered a reference technique. Sidestream capnography, however, analyzes gas away from the patient leading to potentially less accurate measures. While these methodological differences impact the capnogram indices in mechanically ventilated patients, such assessments during spontaneous breathing are essentially lacking. Accordingly, we aimed to compare mainstream and sidestream capnography in spontaneously breathing subjects, focusing on differences in capnogram shape and dead space indices at various respiratory rates. Simultaneous mainstream and sidestream time and volumetric capnography were performed on spontaneously breathing adults (n = 35). Measurements were performed during controlled low (10/min), medium (12/min), and high (20/min) breathing rates as a challenge. Correlation and Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess trends and agreements between time and volumetric capnography indices obtained by the mainstream and sidestream techniques, including end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (ETCO<sub>2</sub>), shape factors reflecting the slopes of phases 2 and 3, and anatomical and physiological dead space fractions. ETCO<sub>2</sub> and physiological dead space measured by mainstream and sidestream techniques showed excellent correlations (r > 0.90, p < 0.001 for all breathing rates) and agreements. While strong correlations and moderate agreements were evidenced in the parameters reflecting the late phase of expiration (phase 3 slope and exhaled CO<sub>2</sub> volume), these relationships were weaker for indices related to the early phase of expiration (phase 2 slope, anatomical dead space). Changing breathing frequency caused significant alterations in all capnography parameters, which were detectable by both mainstream and sidestream techniques. Sidestream capnography cannot substitute the more accurate mainstream technique for measuring the absolute values of shape factors and ventilation dead space fractions. However, sidestream capnography is also able to detect and track changes in uneven alveolar emptying, ventilation-perfusion matching and ventilation dead space fraction in spontaneously breathing subjects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75808-0
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relationships between capnogram parameters by mainstream and sidestream techniques at different breathing frequencies

Gergely H. Fodor, Ferenc Rárosi, Zoltán Novàk, Ibolya Tóth et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
1.26
article

Relationships between capnogram parameters by mainstream and sidestream techniques at different breathing frequencies

Gergely H. Fodor, Ferenc Rárosi, Zoltán Novàk, Ibolya Tóth, József Tolnai, Ferenc Peták, Barna Babik
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Capnography, routinely used in operating rooms and intensive care units, reveals essential information on lung ventilation and ventilation-perfusion matching. Mainstream capnography directly measures CO<sub>2</sub> in the breathing circuit for accurate analysis and is considered a reference technique. Sidestream capnography, however, analyzes gas away from the patient leading to potentially less accurate measures. While these methodological differences impact the capnogram indices in mechanically ventilated patients, such assessments during spontaneous breathing are essentially lacking. Accordingly, we aimed to compare mainstream and sidestream capnography in spontaneously breathing subjects, focusing on differences in capnogram shape and dead space indices at various respiratory rates. Simultaneous mainstream and sidestream time and volumetric capnography were performed on spontaneously breathing adults (n = 35). Measurements were performed during controlled low (10/min), medium (12/min), and high (20/min) breathing rates as a challenge. Correlation and Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess trends and agreements between time and volumetric capnography indices obtained by the mainstream and sidestream techniques, including end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (ETCO<sub>2</sub>), shape factors reflecting the slopes of phases 2 and 3, and anatomical and physiological dead space fractions. ETCO<sub>2</sub> and physiological dead space measured by mainstream and sidestream techniques showed excellent correlations (r > 0.90, p < 0.001 for all breathing rates) and agreements. While strong correlations and moderate agreements were evidenced in the parameters reflecting the late phase of expiration (phase 3 slope and exhaled CO<sub>2</sub> volume), these relationships were weaker for indices related to the early phase of expiration (phase 2 slope, anatomical dead space). Changing breathing frequency caused significant alterations in all capnography parameters, which were detectable by both mainstream and sidestream techniques. Sidestream capnography cannot substitute the more accurate mainstream technique for measuring the absolute values of shape factors and ventilation dead space fractions. However, sidestream capnography is also able to detect and track changes in uneven alveolar emptying, ventilation-perfusion matching and ventilation dead space fraction in spontaneously breathing subjects.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
University of Szeged (HU)
Hungarian Scientific Research Fund, Hungarian Science Foundation, Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal, Magyar Tüdőgyógyász Társaság
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
1.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.