The French Version of the Academic Major Satisfaction Scale: Structural, Convergent, and Divergent Validity

Satisfaction with academic studies is a subjective indicator of students’ well-being and experiences in the context of studies. However, evidence for the reliability and validity of academic satisfaction measures, particularly their French variants, is still limited, thus restricting the administration of evidence-based assessments of academic satisfaction in many regions. The present study aimed to adapt and validate a French version of the Academic Major Satisfaction Scale (AMSS-F), among the most widely used assessments of one’s overall satisfaction with academic studies. Analysis of the data of 530 French-speaking bachelor’s and master’s students supported the structural validity of the AMSS-F, with measurement invariance established across genders, academic levels, and socioeconomic backgrounds. Moreover, supporting its convergent validity, the AMSS-F was strongly associated with the satisfaction of autonomy needs and commitment to studies, as well as with the satisfaction of competence and relatedness needs. Divergent validity was demonstrated through negative and weaker associations with multiple career decision-making difficulties, as well as trait anxiety and self-esteem. Our findings support using the AMSS-F as a reliable and valid assessment in research and practice to measure academic satisfaction among French-speaking individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Career Assessment
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727241296089
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The French Version of the Academic Major Satisfaction Scale: Structural, Convergent, and Divergent Validity

Nimrod Levin, Koorosh Massoudi, Fabrizio Butera, A. Tarciso Borges et al.
1 citations
Journal of Career Assessment
Higher Education Research Studies
2.10
article

The French Version of the Academic Major Satisfaction Scale: Structural, Convergent, and Divergent Validity

Nimrod Levin, Koorosh Massoudi, Fabrizio Butera, A. Tarciso Borges, Anne-Céline Christen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Satisfaction with academic studies is a subjective indicator of students’ well-being and experiences in the context of studies. However, evidence for the reliability and validity of academic satisfaction measures, particularly their French variants, is still limited, thus restricting the administration of evidence-based assessments of academic satisfaction in many regions. The present study aimed to adapt and validate a French version of the Academic Major Satisfaction Scale (AMSS-F), among the most widely used assessments of one’s overall satisfaction with academic studies. Analysis of the data of 530 French-speaking bachelor’s and master’s students supported the structural validity of the AMSS-F, with measurement invariance established across genders, academic levels, and socioeconomic backgrounds. Moreover, supporting its convergent validity, the AMSS-F was strongly associated with the satisfaction of autonomy needs and commitment to studies, as well as with the satisfaction of competence and relatedness needs. Divergent validity was demonstrated through negative and weaker associations with multiple career decision-making difficulties, as well as trait anxiety and self-esteem. Our findings support using the AMSS-F as a reliable and valid assessment in research and practice to measure academic satisfaction among French-speaking individuals.

Journal of Career AssessmentVol. 33(4)
FORS – Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences (CH), University of Lausanne (CH)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Higher Education Research Studies
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.