The Earliest Known Text in Latin by a Nahuatl Speaker: Juan de Tlaxcala, “Verba sociorum domini Petri Tlacauepantzi” (1541)

Abstract In the 1500s, don Pedro de Montezuma, son of Motecuhzoma Xocoyotzin (Montezuma II), petitioned for the return of land and estates in Tula, fifty miles away from Mexico City. A report that was compiled in Latin in 1541, now generally known as “Verba sociorum domini Petri Tlacauepantzi,” remains an important source for his contested claim. This article presents a transcription and the first translation of the document into English. After (1) a synopsis and elucidation of its content, the introductory discussion will (2) highlight linguistic and scribal evidence to show that the text was written by a speaker of Nahuatl, (3) confirm Pedro de Montezuma’s identification of the writer as Juan de Tlaxcala, and (4) offer some concluding reflections on the significance of his use of Latin in this context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethnohistory
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/00141801-11513026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Latin American history and culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Earliest Known Text in Latin by a Nahuatl Speaker: Juan de Tlaxcala, “Verba sociorum domini Petri Tlacauepantzi” (1541)

Andrew Laird
1 citations
Ethnohistory
Latin American history and culture
6.49
article

The Earliest Known Text in Latin by a Nahuatl Speaker: Juan de Tlaxcala, “Verba sociorum domini Petri Tlacauepantzi” (1541)

Andrew Laird
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the 1500s, don Pedro de Montezuma, son of Motecuhzoma Xocoyotzin (Montezuma II), petitioned for the return of land and estates in Tula, fifty miles away from Mexico City. A report that was compiled in Latin in 1541, now generally known as “Verba sociorum domini Petri Tlacauepantzi,” remains an important source for his contested claim. This article presents a transcription and the first translation of the document into English. After (1) a synopsis and elucidation of its content, the introductory discussion will (2) highlight linguistic and scribal evidence to show that the text was written by a speaker of Nahuatl, (3) confirm Pedro de Montezuma’s identification of the writer as Juan de Tlaxcala, and (4) offer some concluding reflections on the significance of his use of Latin in this context.

EthnohistoryVol. 71(4)
John Brown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Latin American history and culture
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.