Social networks and distributive conflict: the class divide in social ties and attitudes to income inequality across 29 countries

Abstract The theoretical proposition that social networks contribute to class divides in political attitudes has rarely been further developed or empirically scrutinized with individual-level data on a large cross-national scale. In this article, we theorize and empirically examine how the class profiles of personal networks may shape individual attitudes to income inequality from a country-comparative perspective. Using multilevel modeling and data from the ISSP Social Networks and Resources module, covering 29 countries, we find that having more family, friends, and acquaintances in upper-middle-class positions is associated with lower support for reducing inequality, while having more social ties to working-class positions is associated with higher support for reducing inequality. We also assess how these relationships differ across countries depending on the institutional context, finding that both own class location and the class profiles of personal networks are more strongly related to attitudes to income inequality in countries with a higher rate of government redistribution. The study provides new theoretical and empirical insights into the importance of personal networks’ class profiles for shaping individual attitudes and structural ideological divisions linked to economic inequality, while also suggesting that social networks are key to understanding institutionally embedded distributive conflicts from a country-comparative perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Sociological Review
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcae039
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social networks and distributive conflict: the class divide in social ties and attitudes to income inequality across 29 countries

Arvid Lindh, Anton B. Andersson
6 citations
European Sociological Review
Social Policy and Reform Studies
13.39
article

Social networks and distributive conflict: the class divide in social ties and attitudes to income inequality across 29 countries

Arvid Lindh, Anton B. Andersson
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract The theoretical proposition that social networks contribute to class divides in political attitudes has rarely been further developed or empirically scrutinized with individual-level data on a large cross-national scale. In this article, we theorize and empirically examine how the class profiles of personal networks may shape individual attitudes to income inequality from a country-comparative perspective. Using multilevel modeling and data from the ISSP Social Networks and Resources module, covering 29 countries, we find that having more family, friends, and acquaintances in upper-middle-class positions is associated with lower support for reducing inequality, while having more social ties to working-class positions is associated with higher support for reducing inequality. We also assess how these relationships differ across countries depending on the institutional context, finding that both own class location and the class profiles of personal networks are more strongly related to attitudes to income inequality in countries with a higher rate of government redistribution. The study provides new theoretical and empirical insights into the importance of personal networks’ class profiles for shaping individual attitudes and structural ideological divisions linked to economic inequality, while also suggesting that social networks are key to understanding institutionally embedded distributive conflicts from a country-comparative perspective.

European Sociological ReviewVol. 41(2)
Stockholm University (SE), Swedish Institute (SE)
Princeton University, Vetenskapsrådet, Umeå Universitet, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd, Stockholms Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
13.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.