A local evaluation of the non-surgical oncology advanced practice curriculum framework

Background: In the non-surgical oncology specialism, there are a number of healthcare professionals with unique knowledge, skills and attributes that have the potential to build on this foundation and have a positive impact on patient care and outcomes. The use of the wider healthcare workforce to support clinical services has been identified as a partial solution to the UK's projected shortfall of clinical and medical oncologists, and also provides opportunities for development of experienced healthcare professionals. In order to standardise education and training, promoting patient and practitioner safety, a speciality training framework is required. Aims: This article aims to assess the relevance of the curriculum framework for advanced practitioners in non-surgical oncology and to examine its associated implementation issues in Northern England. Methods: A qualitative study examined the perspectives of professionals currently working with, training, or working as advanced practitioners (APs) around the non-surgical oncology advanced practice (NSOAP) curriculum framework. Data were gathered via semi-structured interviews with 14 participants. Data were then analysed and themes were extracted. Results and discussion: Four overarching themes emerged: AP role description; the curriculum framework; barriers to the AP role; and enablers to the AP role. Conclusion: Overall, the NSOAP curriculum framework was welcomed by the participants as a required structured programme of education and training. The data highlighted some areas for further development around systemic anti-cancer therapies and onco-geriatrics. The wider implementation considerations also informed future dissemination plans for the NSOAP curriculum framework.