PRIMARY PCI FOR MULTIVESSEL DISEASE: EXPLORING THE OPTIMAL STRATEGY FOR CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION

Multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) presents a significant challenge in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a widely accepted treatment strategy for high-risk patients, including those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). However, whether immediate multivessel PCI or staged PCI leads to better outcomes remains an area of ongoing research. Objective: This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes between immediate multivessel PCI and staged PCI in patients with multivessel CAD undergoing primary PCI. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care center, collecting data from 1st March 2023, to 31st March 2024. The study included 200 patients aged 18 years and older diagnosed with ACS and multivessel disease, defined as stenosis ≥70% in at least two coronary arteries. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the PCI strategy (immediate multivessel PCI vs. staged PCI). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis. Secondary outcomes included recurrent angina, heart failure requiring hospitalization, and bleeding complications. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0, and survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: MACE occurred in 48 patients (24%) during the one-year follow-up. The staged PCI group showed significantly lower MACE rates (16%) compared to the immediate PCI group (32%, p = 0.005). Recurrent angina was also less frequent in the staged PCI group (10%) compared to the immediate PCI group (18%, p = 0.046). Multivariate analysis identified diabetes mellitus (HR: 2.4, p < 0.001) and CKD (HR: 2.1, p = 0.002) as independent predictors of MACE. Conclusion: Staged PCI offers superior outcomes compared to immediate multivessel PCI in patients with multivessel CAD, particularly those with diabetes and CKD. These findings suggest that individualized revascularization strategies may improve long-term cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1219
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PRIMARY PCI FOR MULTIVESSEL DISEASE: EXPLORING THE OPTIMAL STRATEGY FOR CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION

FR KHAN, S AKBER, AS Khan
1 citations
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
0.57
article

PRIMARY PCI FOR MULTIVESSEL DISEASE: EXPLORING THE OPTIMAL STRATEGY FOR CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION

FR KHAN, S AKBER, AS Khan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) presents a significant challenge in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a widely accepted treatment strategy for high-risk patients, including those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). However, whether immediate multivessel PCI or staged PCI leads to better outcomes remains an area of ongoing research. Objective: This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes between immediate multivessel PCI and staged PCI in patients with multivessel CAD undergoing primary PCI. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care center, collecting data from 1st March 2023, to 31st March 2024. The study included 200 patients aged 18 years and older diagnosed with ACS and multivessel disease, defined as stenosis ≥70% in at least two coronary arteries. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the PCI strategy (immediate multivessel PCI vs. staged PCI). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis. Secondary outcomes included recurrent angina, heart failure requiring hospitalization, and bleeding complications. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0, and survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: MACE occurred in 48 patients (24%) during the one-year follow-up. The staged PCI group showed significantly lower MACE rates (16%) compared to the immediate PCI group (32%, p = 0.005). Recurrent angina was also less frequent in the staged PCI group (10%) compared to the immediate PCI group (18%, p = 0.046). Multivariate analysis identified diabetes mellitus (HR: 2.4, p < 0.001) and CKD (HR: 2.1, p = 0.002) as independent predictors of MACE. Conclusion: Staged PCI offers superior outcomes compared to immediate multivessel PCI in patients with multivessel CAD, particularly those with diabetes and CKD. These findings suggest that individualized revascularization strategies may improve long-term cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk populations.

Biological and Clinical Sciences Research JournalVol. 2024(1)
Lady Reading Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.