An open-source approach for measuring corporate impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity

Abstract Existing approaches to evaluating companies on sustainability-related issues include limited accounting of impacts on nature and its contributions to human well-being. Here we present an approach for quantifying the direct impacts of companies’ physical assets on nature based on global maps for eight ecosystem service and biodiversity metrics. We apply this approach to a set of over 2000 global, publicly traded companies with 580,000 mapped physical assets and find that companies in utility, real estate, materials, and financial sectors have the largest impacts on average, with substantial variation within all sectors. Using high-spatial-resolution satellite imagery to map individual mine footprints, we compare a set of active lithium mines and find that impacts vary substantially among mines and change over time. By using open-source models and drawing on the growing availability of high-spatial-resolution satellite imagery, this approach could provide more transparent measures of corporate impacts to nature for nature-related reporting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01797-7
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An open-source approach for measuring corporate impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity

Jeffrey R. Smith, Jesse A. Goldstein, Rebecca Chaplin‐Kramer, Richard Sharp et al.
7 citations
Communications Earth & Environment
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.98
article

An open-source approach for measuring corporate impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity

Jeffrey R. Smith, Jesse A. Goldstein, Rebecca Chaplin‐Kramer, Richard Sharp, Andrew Shea, Stacie Wolny, Emily Soth, Lisa Mandle, Mayur Patel
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Existing approaches to evaluating companies on sustainability-related issues include limited accounting of impacts on nature and its contributions to human well-being. Here we present an approach for quantifying the direct impacts of companies’ physical assets on nature based on global maps for eight ecosystem service and biodiversity metrics. We apply this approach to a set of over 2000 global, publicly traded companies with 580,000 mapped physical assets and find that companies in utility, real estate, materials, and financial sectors have the largest impacts on average, with substantial variation within all sectors. Using high-spatial-resolution satellite imagery to map individual mine footprints, we compare a set of active lithium mines and find that impacts vary substantially among mines and change over time. By using open-source models and drawing on the growing availability of high-spatial-resolution satellite imagery, this approach could provide more transparent measures of corporate impacts to nature for nature-related reporting.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 5(1)
University of Minnesota (US), Princeton University (US), Morgan Stanley (United States) (US), Stanford University (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An open-source approach for measuring corporate impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity — Jeffrey R. Smith, Jesse A. Goldstein, et al. · Communications Earth & Environment (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS