Criminal Liability for Sabotage: Standard Improvement Ways from the Perspective of the Foreign and Russian Experience

The article examines the foreign and domestic experience of the legal regulation of criminal liability for sabotage. The authors considered the issues of possible improvement of criminal law counteraction to sabotage, namely: to provide for criminal liability for sabotage in a separate article; to supplement article 281 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with a note providing the basis for exemption from criminal liability for timely warning of authorities or contributing to the prevention of sabotage; to differentiate responsibility depending on the form of guilt in relation to the consequences in the form of deaths of people; criminalize failure to report a person who, according to reliably known information, is preparing, committing or has committed sabotage.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Military juridical journal
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2108-2024-6-18-22
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criminal Liability for Sabotage: Standard Improvement Ways from the Perspective of the Foreign and Russian Experience

Yu. S. Pestereva, Pavel V. Poshelov
Military juridical journal
Digital Transformation in Law
article

Criminal Liability for Sabotage: Standard Improvement Ways from the Perspective of the Foreign and Russian Experience

Yu. S. Pestereva, Pavel V. Poshelov
article en

Abstract

The article examines the foreign and domestic experience of the legal regulation of criminal liability for sabotage. The authors considered the issues of possible improvement of criminal law counteraction to sabotage, namely: to provide for criminal liability for sabotage in a separate article; to supplement article 281 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with a note providing the basis for exemption from criminal liability for timely warning of authorities or contributing to the prevention of sabotage; to differentiate responsibility depending on the form of guilt in relation to the consequences in the form of deaths of people; criminalize failure to report a person who, according to reliably known information, is preparing, committing or has committed sabotage.

Military juridical journal
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Digital Transformation in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.