Examining the influence of social anxiety biases on emotion recognition for masked versus unmasked facial expressions

Preliminary evidence suggests reductions in emotion recognition accuracy to mask-wearing faces compared to no-mask-wearing faces in healthy volunteers. In socially anxious individuals, who tend to interpret positive or neutral facial expressions as more negative, emotional decoding biases might be even more compromised. This study aimed to replicate and extend previous findings on the impact of mask-wearing on emotion recognition in a Western sample while also examining the impact of social anxiety symptom severity. One hundred eleven university students completed a computerized emotion recognition task depicting gender and race-balanced faces, each modeling one of the six basic emotions and a neutral expression, with and without a medical mask. Using repeated measures ANOVAs and ANCOVAs, we investigated the effect of facemask condition and social anxiety severity on emotion recognition performance. Consistent with earlier research, the results of this study replicated the finding that wearing face masks led to decreased accuracy in emotion recognition across all emotions tested. Contrary to expectations, social anxiety symptoms did not moderate this effect. Despite the observed reduction in emotion recognition accuracy associated with mask-wearing, socially anxious individuals did not appear to be at a higher risk of experiencing impaired emotion recognition compared to their less anxious counterparts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Psychopathology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20438087241277573
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the influence of social anxiety biases on emotion recognition for masked versus unmasked facial expressions

Sofía Uribe, Alicia E. Meuret
Journal of Experimental Psychopathology
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

Examining the influence of social anxiety biases on emotion recognition for masked versus unmasked facial expressions

Sofía Uribe, Alicia E. Meuret
article en

Abstract

Preliminary evidence suggests reductions in emotion recognition accuracy to mask-wearing faces compared to no-mask-wearing faces in healthy volunteers. In socially anxious individuals, who tend to interpret positive or neutral facial expressions as more negative, emotional decoding biases might be even more compromised. This study aimed to replicate and extend previous findings on the impact of mask-wearing on emotion recognition in a Western sample while also examining the impact of social anxiety symptom severity. One hundred eleven university students completed a computerized emotion recognition task depicting gender and race-balanced faces, each modeling one of the six basic emotions and a neutral expression, with and without a medical mask. Using repeated measures ANOVAs and ANCOVAs, we investigated the effect of facemask condition and social anxiety severity on emotion recognition performance. Consistent with earlier research, the results of this study replicated the finding that wearing face masks led to decreased accuracy in emotion recognition across all emotions tested. Contrary to expectations, social anxiety symptoms did not moderate this effect. Despite the observed reduction in emotion recognition accuracy associated with mask-wearing, socially anxious individuals did not appear to be at a higher risk of experiencing impaired emotion recognition compared to their less anxious counterparts.

Journal of Experimental PsychopathologyVol. 15(4)
Southern Methodist University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.