The impact of power decentralization on the regional development of Ukraine under martial law

Regional development in the context of implementing European practices is a key factor in the realization of Ukraine's European integration strategy. This requires the further introduction of tools aimed at overcoming centralized management practices in favor of decentralization tools that provide greater autonomy for local and regional authorities, creating conditions for accelerating the development of communities and regions. This topic becomes particularly relevant during the state of martial law in Ukraine, which necessitates the consolidation of resources to ensure national security and defense, while also requiring the resolution of pressing social issues (refugees, business relocation, etc.). Therefore, the aim of the article is to study the impact of decentralization on regional development processes in wartime conditions. The methodological basis of the research is a harmonious synthesis of three approaches: systemic, institutional, and structural-functional, each of which allows for the analysis of the role and potential of implementing practices and mechanisms of decentralization to enhance the effectiveness of public management during large-scale crises. It has been determined that the war has already inflicted colossal damage on the country’s economy, the overcoming of which is impossible without the implementation of flexible management practices, further redistribution of resources in favor of communities and regions, and the attraction of donor assistance and investments for recovery. Decentralization facilitates targeted resource use and allows for attracting investments for specific projects that will aid the development of communities and regions. On the other hand, decentralization tools enable local and regional problems to be addressed more promptly. The positive impact of decentralization on government bodies has been demonstrated in terms of their responsiveness to new challenges and threats posed by the war. It has been noted that the success of decentralization depends on the level of civic engagement: the degree of citizen involvement in decision-making, public initiatives, and so on. The main promising directions of decentralization have been identified, which should ensure the development of both territorial communities and regions, as well as promote the attraction of investment for post-war recovery. All of this is intended to enhance the resilience of Ukrainian regions and promote sustainable post-war development.