Perturbing reach elicits anticipatory responses in transport and grasp

When the perturbation was expected, EMG activity of the <i>triceps</i> and <i>pectoralis major</i> muscles significantly increased about 50 - 200 ms before the perturbation onset. Peak acceleration of the reach was significantly higher and occurred earlier relative to control trials. Similar adjustments were observed in the grasp kinematics, reflected as significantly shorter time to peak aperture velocity and acceleration, as well as in increased activity of <i>flexor</i> and <i>extensor digitorum</i> 100-200 ms before perturbation onset. In summary, our data demonstrate that knowledge of an upcoming perturbation of reach during reach-to-grasp action triggers anticipatory adjustments not only in the muscles controlling the reach component, but also in those controlling grasp. Furthermore, our data revealed that the preparatory activations were generalized, rather than direction specific.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1423821
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perturbing reach elicits anticipatory responses in transport and grasp

Eugene Tunik, Anna Akbaş, Mathew Yarossi, Mariusz P. Furmanek et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Motor Control and Adaptation
0.34
article

Perturbing reach elicits anticipatory responses in transport and grasp

Eugene Tunik, Anna Akbaş, Mathew Yarossi, Mariusz P. Furmanek, Sarah Hsu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

When the perturbation was expected, EMG activity of the <i>triceps</i> and <i>pectoralis major</i> muscles significantly increased about 50 - 200 ms before the perturbation onset. Peak acceleration of the reach was significantly higher and occurred earlier relative to control trials. Similar adjustments were observed in the grasp kinematics, reflected as significantly shorter time to peak aperture velocity and acceleration, as well as in increased activity of <i>flexor</i> and <i>extensor digitorum</i> 100-200 ms before perturbation onset. In summary, our data demonstrate that knowledge of an upcoming perturbation of reach during reach-to-grasp action triggers anticipatory adjustments not only in the muscles controlling the reach component, but also in those controlling grasp. Furthermore, our data revealed that the preparatory activations were generalized, rather than direction specific.

Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceVol. 18
Northeastern University (US), University of Rhode Island (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems, Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Motor Control and Adaptation
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perturbing reach elicits anticipatory responses in transport and grasp — Eugene Tunik, Anna Akbaş, et al. · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS