Perspectives of Czech High School Students on Cheating in Remote Education

This study explores the perspectives of Czech high school students on using digital technologies for cheating during remote education, a phenomenon encouraged by the abrupt transition to online learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Through a mixed-methods research design, this study collected data via an online questionnaire with 24 questions completed by 316 students from secondary schools and conducted individual interviews with seven teachers. In their study, the authors focus on three questions: How much do high school students know which digital technology they can use for cheating in remote online education? What are their experiences with cheating in remote online education? What are the preventive solutions recommended by students and teachers to eliminate online cheating? The research findings indicate that students perceive online cheating as justifiable, primarily due to their disengagement with the course material and lack of interest in learning under the pandemic's extraordinary circumstances. Students frequently used technical means for cheating, with mobile phones and screen-sharing during online tests being the most popular methods. Additionally, the use of internet resources to find answers was the most commonly reported form of online cheating. To address this issue, students outlined various anti-cheating strategies, categorised into three perspectives: pessimistic, practical, and critical-realistic. The pessimistic perspective indicates scepticism about the feasibility of effectively combating cheating, whereas the practical perspective offers tangible, immediate solutions. The critical-realistic view provides a thoughtful and pragmatic approach to the problem, suggesting a balance between understanding the complexities of cheating and implementing realistic measures. The study highlights educators' critical role and emphasises the importance of aligning assessment methods with students' learning needs and expectations to reduce cheating tendencies naturally. The rise of AI technologies has introduced new dimensions to the problem of online cheating, as AI tools can facilitate academic dishonesty. However, AI can help detect and prevent cheating. The authors suggest using formative assessments and creating an engaging, supportive online learning environment to deter dishonesty and promote academic integrity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Conference on e-Learning
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34190/ecel.23.1.2773
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Educational Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives of Czech High School Students on Cheating in Remote Education

Hasan Selçuk, Miroslava Černochová, Tomáš Podoljak
1 citations
European Conference on e-Learning
Innovative Educational Technologies
0.78
article

Perspectives of Czech High School Students on Cheating in Remote Education

Hasan Selçuk, Miroslava Černochová, Tomáš Podoljak
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study explores the perspectives of Czech high school students on using digital technologies for cheating during remote education, a phenomenon encouraged by the abrupt transition to online learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Through a mixed-methods research design, this study collected data via an online questionnaire with 24 questions completed by 316 students from secondary schools and conducted individual interviews with seven teachers. In their study, the authors focus on three questions: How much do high school students know which digital technology they can use for cheating in remote online education? What are their experiences with cheating in remote online education? What are the preventive solutions recommended by students and teachers to eliminate online cheating? The research findings indicate that students perceive online cheating as justifiable, primarily due to their disengagement with the course material and lack of interest in learning under the pandemic's extraordinary circumstances. Students frequently used technical means for cheating, with mobile phones and screen-sharing during online tests being the most popular methods. Additionally, the use of internet resources to find answers was the most commonly reported form of online cheating. To address this issue, students outlined various anti-cheating strategies, categorised into three perspectives: pessimistic, practical, and critical-realistic. The pessimistic perspective indicates scepticism about the feasibility of effectively combating cheating, whereas the practical perspective offers tangible, immediate solutions. The critical-realistic view provides a thoughtful and pragmatic approach to the problem, suggesting a balance between understanding the complexities of cheating and implementing realistic measures. The study highlights educators' critical role and emphasises the importance of aligning assessment methods with students' learning needs and expectations to reduce cheating tendencies naturally. The rise of AI technologies has introduced new dimensions to the problem of online cheating, as AI tools can facilitate academic dishonesty. However, AI can help detect and prevent cheating. The authors suggest using formative assessments and creating an engaging, supportive online learning environment to deter dishonesty and promote academic integrity.

European Conference on e-LearningVol. 23(1)
Charles University (CZ), University of Latvia (LV)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Innovative Educational Technologies
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.