Characterizing teacher‐perceived and student‐perceived teacher–student relationship types and associations with student functioning in students with special educational needs: A cross‐sectional study using latent profile analyses

Abstract High‐quality teacher–student relationships are related to a wide range of positive student outcomes, especially in students with special educational needs. To enable tailored support to help teachers engage in positive relationships with these students, it is important to identify and understand the different types of teacher–student relationships that can emerge in this context. Aims of this study were to identify distinct teacher–student relationship types in special education and characterize these in terms of students' gender, problem behaviour, underachievement and teacher‐perceived supporting ability. We explored consensus regarding perceived relationship‐quality across teachers and students. In a cross‐sectional design, 27 upper elementary special education teachers participated with 340 students (66.8% boys; Mage = 10.83). A latent profile analysis based on teacher reports revealed five relationship types: a close (52.9%), moderate (25.3%), ambivalent (8.8%), distanced (7.4%) and conflicted (5.6%) relationship. Student reports revealed three relationship types: close (65.9%), moderate (25.0%) and conflicted (9.1%). A high‐quality, close relationship type was associated with less student problem behaviour and lower teacher‐perceived supporting ability than lower‐quality relationship types. Teachers and students had different perspectives on their shared relationship. These findings advance our understanding of the complexity of the dyadic teacher–student relationship and may inform interventions to enhance relationship quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12732
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing teacher‐perceived and student‐perceived teacher–student relationship types and associations with student functioning in students with special educational needs: A cross‐sectional study using latent profile analyses

Nouchka T. Tick, Kirsten Hoogendijk, Sophie C. Alsem, Femke van den Brink
1 citations
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
Early Childhood Education and Development
2.10
article

Characterizing teacher‐perceived and student‐perceived teacher–student relationship types and associations with student functioning in students with special educational needs: A cross‐sectional study using latent profile analyses

Nouchka T. Tick, Kirsten Hoogendijk, Sophie C. Alsem, Femke van den Brink
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract High‐quality teacher–student relationships are related to a wide range of positive student outcomes, especially in students with special educational needs. To enable tailored support to help teachers engage in positive relationships with these students, it is important to identify and understand the different types of teacher–student relationships that can emerge in this context. Aims of this study were to identify distinct teacher–student relationship types in special education and characterize these in terms of students' gender, problem behaviour, underachievement and teacher‐perceived supporting ability. We explored consensus regarding perceived relationship‐quality across teachers and students. In a cross‐sectional design, 27 upper elementary special education teachers participated with 340 students (66.8% boys; Mage = 10.83). A latent profile analysis based on teacher reports revealed five relationship types: a close (52.9%), moderate (25.3%), ambivalent (8.8%), distanced (7.4%) and conflicted (5.6%) relationship. Student reports revealed three relationship types: close (65.9%), moderate (25.0%) and conflicted (9.1%). A high‐quality, close relationship type was associated with less student problem behaviour and lower teacher‐perceived supporting ability than lower‐quality relationship types. Teachers and students had different perspectives on their shared relationship. These findings advance our understanding of the complexity of the dyadic teacher–student relationship and may inform interventions to enhance relationship quality.

Journal of Research in Special Educational NeedsVol. 25(2)
Utrecht University (NL), Yulius (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Nationaal Regieorgaan Onderwijsonderzoek
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Early Childhood Education and Development
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.