Labelling of Fluids in the Sterile Field During Orthopaedic Surgery: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Background Intraoperative safety protocols, including proper labelling of syringes, are critical to patient safety in surgical settings. While the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and the Royal College of Anaesthetists provide clear guidelines to prevent medication errors, ensuring consistent compliance with labelling protocols in the fast-paced and complex environment of orthopaedic surgery can still present practical challenges. The absence of proper labelling, combined with the use of multiple fluids such as normal saline, disinfectants, and local anaesthetics, increases the risk of adverse outcomes due to fluid misidentification. This quality improvement project aimed to assess current labelling practices in a district general hospital, identify barriers to compliance, and develop a cost-effective solution. Methodology The project was conducted in three orthopaedic theatres over two audit cycles. During the first audit cycle, 30 procedures were observed to assess compliance with labelling guidelines. Compliance was defined as the labelling of all syringes containing fluids present in the sterile field. Following this, an intervention was introduced, using surgical marker pens and sterile stickers for fluid labelling, along with a mandatory "tactical pause and check" and an awareness campaign. Two months later, a second audit of 34 procedures was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. Results In the first audit cycle, only three out of 30 procedures (10%) were compliant with labelling guidelines. Following the intervention, compliance increased dramatically to 32 out of 34 procedures (94%). The results were statistically significant (p < 0.05) as determined by Fisher's exact test. The use of sterile stickers and marker pens proved to be a simple and cost-effective solution that did not interfere with the sterile environment or increase costs. Conclusions This study demonstrates that a low-cost intervention using sterile stickers and surgical marker pens can significantly improve compliance with fluid labelling guidelines in orthopaedic surgery, thereby enhancing patient safety. While the intervention was successful, future research should explore more sustainable solutions, such as pre-printed sterile labels, and evaluate the long-term impact of such interventions across various surgical settings. Continuous education and regular audits will be essential in maintaining high compliance rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72250
Primary Topic
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Labelling of Fluids in the Sterile Field During Orthopaedic Surgery: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Sarfraz Khan, Ghulam Dastagir Faisal Mohammed, Satya Kanth V. Pydah, Zubair Younis et al.
Cureus
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
article

Labelling of Fluids in the Sterile Field During Orthopaedic Surgery: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Sarfraz Khan, Ghulam Dastagir Faisal Mohammed, Satya Kanth V. Pydah, Zubair Younis, Benedict Sweetman, E. Jones, Jebran Amin, Charlotte Lemaigre
article en

Abstract

Background Intraoperative safety protocols, including proper labelling of syringes, are critical to patient safety in surgical settings. While the Royal Pharmaceutical Society and the Royal College of Anaesthetists provide clear guidelines to prevent medication errors, ensuring consistent compliance with labelling protocols in the fast-paced and complex environment of orthopaedic surgery can still present practical challenges. The absence of proper labelling, combined with the use of multiple fluids such as normal saline, disinfectants, and local anaesthetics, increases the risk of adverse outcomes due to fluid misidentification. This quality improvement project aimed to assess current labelling practices in a district general hospital, identify barriers to compliance, and develop a cost-effective solution. Methodology The project was conducted in three orthopaedic theatres over two audit cycles. During the first audit cycle, 30 procedures were observed to assess compliance with labelling guidelines. Compliance was defined as the labelling of all syringes containing fluids present in the sterile field. Following this, an intervention was introduced, using surgical marker pens and sterile stickers for fluid labelling, along with a mandatory "tactical pause and check" and an awareness campaign. Two months later, a second audit of 34 procedures was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. Results In the first audit cycle, only three out of 30 procedures (10%) were compliant with labelling guidelines. Following the intervention, compliance increased dramatically to 32 out of 34 procedures (94%). The results were statistically significant (p < 0.05) as determined by Fisher's exact test. The use of sterile stickers and marker pens proved to be a simple and cost-effective solution that did not interfere with the sterile environment or increase costs. Conclusions This study demonstrates that a low-cost intervention using sterile stickers and surgical marker pens can significantly improve compliance with fluid labelling guidelines in orthopaedic surgery, thereby enhancing patient safety. While the intervention was successful, future research should explore more sustainable solutions, such as pre-printed sterile labels, and evaluate the long-term impact of such interventions across various surgical settings. Continuous education and regular audits will be essential in maintaining high compliance rates.

CureusVol. 16(10)
Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Royal Shrewsbury Hospital (GB), Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.