‘Brutal magic’: Staging Human-Environmental Relations in the Anthropocene

When Charles Baudelaire visited the diorama, a form of nineteenth-century popular entertainment, he was entranced by its evident falseness which gave way to what he termed ‘useful truths’. By generating a convincing illusion of nature through conspicuously mechanical means, the diorama provoked its spectators to experience an intersubjective engagement with their environment. The form was later marshalled in the service of natural history, but the pedagogical and ideological imperatives of the early twentieth-century museum denied the explicit falsehood that was so central to the original diorama. When the form was revived by twenty-first century contemporary artists, the open acknowledgement of its illusory quality was restored as part of a critique of singular authority. Reckoning with the role of deception in an Anthropocene diorama displayed in Paris’s Museum of Hunting and Nature, this article asks how what Baudelaire termed the diorama’s ‘brutal magic’ might speak to environmental lies and truths today.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
19 Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16995/ntn.17127
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Brutal magic’: Staging Human-Environmental Relations in the Anthropocene

19 Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century
Intellectual Property Law
article

‘Brutal magic’: Staging Human-Environmental Relations in the Anthropocene

article en

Abstract

When Charles Baudelaire visited the diorama, a form of nineteenth-century popular entertainment, he was entranced by its evident falseness which gave way to what he termed ‘useful truths’. By generating a convincing illusion of nature through conspicuously mechanical means, the diorama provoked its spectators to experience an intersubjective engagement with their environment. The form was later marshalled in the service of natural history, but the pedagogical and ideological imperatives of the early twentieth-century museum denied the explicit falsehood that was so central to the original diorama. When the form was revived by twenty-first century contemporary artists, the open acknowledgement of its illusory quality was restored as part of a critique of singular authority. Reckoning with the role of deception in an Anthropocene diorama displayed in Paris’s Museum of Hunting and Nature, this article asks how what Baudelaire termed the diorama’s ‘brutal magic’ might speak to environmental lies and truths today.

19 Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth CenturyVol. 2025(38)
Cornell University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Intellectual Property Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.