A Snapshot of the Constitutional Court's Docket – January to July 2024

Most commentary on the Constitutional Court focuses on its published judgments. Yet the vast majority of applications made to the Court are disposed of in chambers. Empirical studies on this aspect of the Court's work has been limited. Using available online records, we monitored and tracked trends in petitions filed between 1 January 2024 and 26 July 2024. We also extracted some information relating to petitions filed in 2023. We present an overview of the number of petitions received by the Court between January 2023 and July 2024, as well as the rate at which the Court appears to be processing such applications. We then consider the nature of the petitions filed with the Court during the first two terms of 2024. Our analysis includes an overview of the route that litigants have travelled in reaching the Court, the area(s) of law the petitions engage, and for cases which were dismissed, the reasons for dismissal. We find that there are large gaps in the Court's disposition of new applications, and that the processing time for most petitions is relatively prolonged. The data also suggests that the Court is inundated with generalist appeals, as opposed to matters raising issues of special constitutional or public importance. We conclude by briefly outlining some recommendations for further consideration

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17159//1727-3781/2024/v27i0a20135
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Snapshot of the Constitutional Court's Docket – January to July 2024

Nurina Ally
1 citations
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

A Snapshot of the Constitutional Court's Docket – January to July 2024

Nurina Ally
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Most commentary on the Constitutional Court focuses on its published judgments. Yet the vast majority of applications made to the Court are disposed of in chambers. Empirical studies on this aspect of the Court's work has been limited. Using available online records, we monitored and tracked trends in petitions filed between 1 January 2024 and 26 July 2024. We also extracted some information relating to petitions filed in 2023. We present an overview of the number of petitions received by the Court between January 2023 and July 2024, as well as the rate at which the Court appears to be processing such applications. We then consider the nature of the petitions filed with the Court during the first two terms of 2024. Our analysis includes an overview of the route that litigants have travelled in reaching the Court, the area(s) of law the petitions engage, and for cases which were dismissed, the reasons for dismissal. We find that there are large gaps in the Court's disposition of new applications, and that the processing time for most petitions is relatively prolonged. The data also suggests that the Court is inundated with generalist appeals, as opposed to matters raising issues of special constitutional or public importance. We conclude by briefly outlining some recommendations for further consideration

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese RegsbladVol. 27
University of Cape Town (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.