Issues on compensation for damage caused to patients in the provision of healthcare services

Health is one of the most important values of the individual and of society, which calls for a specific model of legal regulation and compensation that best serves the interests of the individual and society. In Lithuania, the new version of the PTŽSAĮ, which entered into force on 1 January 2020, introduced a no-fault model of compensation (administrative model). Analysing the relationship between the newly entered into force model of no-fault compensation (administrative model) and the previously existing model of judicial action, it would be incorrect to state that only the model of no-fault compensation (administrative model) is currently in operation in Lithuania, given the exhaustive list of the persons entitled to apply for non-pecuniary damages, which has been established by the current wording of the PTŽSAĮ, however, according to the authors of the article, by abolishing the exhaustive list of persons entitled to claim compensation for non-pecuniary damages and allowing all persons who have suffered damages as a result of inadequate provision of healthcare to a patient to claim compensation on the basis of the model of no-fault compensation (the administrative model), it would be reasonable to say that the model of no-fault compensation (administrative model), which has been put into force, has indeed changed (is in a position to change) the model of judicial action. Having established that there is reason to believe that the model of no-fault compensation (administrative model) will completely replace the model of judicial action in the future, the authors of the article draw attention to the existence of legal issues related to the implementation of the principle of full compensation in the event of the death of a foetus. Having established that a foetus has a limited right to health and life from the 12th week of pregnancy and a full right to life from the 22nd week of pregnancy, but there is currently no legislation in Lithuania to protect the health of the foetus, it can be concluded such situation raises the problem of the implementation of the principle of full compensation for damages. One potential solution to the problem could be the application of a legal fiction in relation to the foetus in the context of the PTŽSAĮ, as this would ensure the foetus’ right to life and health and justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vilnius University Open Series
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15388/tmp.2024.9
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Issues on compensation for damage caused to patients in the provision of healthcare services

Laura Mackevič, Dominykas Mečanec
Vilnius University Open Series
Legal Studies and Reforms
article

Issues on compensation for damage caused to patients in the provision of healthcare services

Laura Mackevič, Dominykas Mečanec
article en

Abstract

Health is one of the most important values of the individual and of society, which calls for a specific model of legal regulation and compensation that best serves the interests of the individual and society. In Lithuania, the new version of the PTŽSAĮ, which entered into force on 1 January 2020, introduced a no-fault model of compensation (administrative model). Analysing the relationship between the newly entered into force model of no-fault compensation (administrative model) and the previously existing model of judicial action, it would be incorrect to state that only the model of no-fault compensation (administrative model) is currently in operation in Lithuania, given the exhaustive list of the persons entitled to apply for non-pecuniary damages, which has been established by the current wording of the PTŽSAĮ, however, according to the authors of the article, by abolishing the exhaustive list of persons entitled to claim compensation for non-pecuniary damages and allowing all persons who have suffered damages as a result of inadequate provision of healthcare to a patient to claim compensation on the basis of the model of no-fault compensation (the administrative model), it would be reasonable to say that the model of no-fault compensation (administrative model), which has been put into force, has indeed changed (is in a position to change) the model of judicial action. Having established that there is reason to believe that the model of no-fault compensation (administrative model) will completely replace the model of judicial action in the future, the authors of the article draw attention to the existence of legal issues related to the implementation of the principle of full compensation in the event of the death of a foetus. Having established that a foetus has a limited right to health and life from the 12th week of pregnancy and a full right to life from the 22nd week of pregnancy, but there is currently no legislation in Lithuania to protect the health of the foetus, it can be concluded such situation raises the problem of the implementation of the principle of full compensation for damages. One potential solution to the problem could be the application of a legal fiction in relation to the foetus in the context of the PTŽSAĮ, as this would ensure the foetus’ right to life and health and justice.

Vilnius University Open Series
Vilnius University (LT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Legal Studies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.