Limitations of beam-control compensation

In this paper, we use wave-optics simulations to explore the limitations of beam-control compensation. We evaluate performance in terms of the normalized power in a diffraction-limited bucket for the cases of no beam-control compensation, perfect phase compensation, and perfect full-field compensation. From these results, we are able to arrive at the following conclusions: (1) without any form of beam-control compensation, performance begins to degrade when D / r 0 > 1; (2) with perfect phase compensation, performance begins to degrade when D / r 0 > 1 and ( λ / r 0 )/ θ 0 > 1; and (3) with perfect full-field compensation, performance begins to degrade when D / r 0 > 1 and ( λ / D )/ θ 0 > 1. Here, D is the aperture diameter, r 0 is the Fried parameter, λ is the wavelength, and θ 0 is the isoplanatic angle. We show (1)–(3) to be true for varying aperture diameters, uniformly distributed turbulence, and varying turbulence profiles. These findings will inform the development of future laser systems that need to sense and correct for the effects of atmospheric turbulence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Optics Express
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.539797
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Limitations of beam-control compensation

Derek J. Burrell, Milo W. Hyde, Mark F. Spencer, Matthias T. Banet et al.
9 citations
Optics Express
Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
3.04
article

Limitations of beam-control compensation

Derek J. Burrell, Milo W. Hyde, Mark F. Spencer, Matthias T. Banet, Matthew Kalensky, Darren Getts
article en
9 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we use wave-optics simulations to explore the limitations of beam-control compensation. We evaluate performance in terms of the normalized power in a diffraction-limited bucket for the cases of no beam-control compensation, perfect phase compensation, and perfect full-field compensation. From these results, we are able to arrive at the following conclusions: (1) without any form of beam-control compensation, performance begins to degrade when D / r 0 > 1; (2) with perfect phase compensation, performance begins to degrade when D / r 0 > 1 and ( λ / r 0 )/ θ 0 > 1; and (3) with perfect full-field compensation, performance begins to degrade when D / r 0 > 1 and ( λ / D )/ θ 0 > 1. Here, D is the aperture diameter, r 0 is the Fried parameter, λ is the wavelength, and θ 0 is the isoplanatic angle. We show (1)–(3) to be true for varying aperture diameters, uniformly distributed turbulence, and varying turbulence profiles. These findings will inform the development of future laser systems that need to sense and correct for the effects of atmospheric turbulence.

Optics ExpressVol. 32(24)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Office of the Secretary of Defense (US), Kirtland Air Force Base (US), U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory Directed Energy Directorate
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
3.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.