Scale sensitivity of ethanol production via consolidated bioprocessing with consideration of feedstock cost

Abstract We examine feedstock cost and minimum selling price for ethanol production from corn stover as a function of scale, stover yield, participation rate, and price incentives for two conversion technologies: a conventional base case featuring thermochemical pretreatment with added cellulase, and an advanced case featuring consolidated bioprocessing with cotreatment (C‐CBP). Delivered feedstock cost ranged from $85 Mg −1 at small (10 million gallons year −1 or ~38 million L year −1 ) scale with high yield and participation rates to $124 Mg −1 at large scale (60 million gallons year −1 or 227 million L year −1 ) and low yield and participation rates. The minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) was approximately twofold lower for the advanced case compared with the base case. The payback period was several times lower for the advanced case compared with the base case, with increasing disparity at smaller scales, and was highly sensitive to ethanol price supports. For both C‐CBP and the conventional processing paradigm, MESP decreased with increasing scale, indicating that the cost penalty due to higher feedstock transport distances was more than outweighed by lower capital costs. However, the cost penalty for operation at small scale, expressed in $ gallon −1 ethanol, is lower for C‐CBP than for the conventional paradigm by roughly twofold. Particularly for initial applications of C‐CBP, we speculate that this cost penalty will likely be modest compared with the anticipated benefits of small‐scale operation such as increased opportunity to use existing infrastructure, easier plant siting and supply chain establishment, and lower total investment required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2691
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Biofuel production and bioconversion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scale sensitivity of ethanol production via consolidated bioprocessing with consideration of feedstock cost

Lee R. Lynd, Erin Webb, Robin Clark, Madeline Hoey
5 citations
Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining
Biofuel production and bioconversion
0.92
article

Scale sensitivity of ethanol production via consolidated bioprocessing with consideration of feedstock cost

Lee R. Lynd, Erin Webb, Robin Clark, Madeline Hoey
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract We examine feedstock cost and minimum selling price for ethanol production from corn stover as a function of scale, stover yield, participation rate, and price incentives for two conversion technologies: a conventional base case featuring thermochemical pretreatment with added cellulase, and an advanced case featuring consolidated bioprocessing with cotreatment (C‐CBP). Delivered feedstock cost ranged from $85 Mg −1 at small (10 million gallons year −1 or ~38 million L year −1 ) scale with high yield and participation rates to $124 Mg −1 at large scale (60 million gallons year −1 or 227 million L year −1 ) and low yield and participation rates. The minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) was approximately twofold lower for the advanced case compared with the base case. The payback period was several times lower for the advanced case compared with the base case, with increasing disparity at smaller scales, and was highly sensitive to ethanol price supports. For both C‐CBP and the conventional processing paradigm, MESP decreased with increasing scale, indicating that the cost penalty due to higher feedstock transport distances was more than outweighed by lower capital costs. However, the cost penalty for operation at small scale, expressed in $ gallon −1 ethanol, is lower for C‐CBP than for the conventional paradigm by roughly twofold. Particularly for initial applications of C‐CBP, we speculate that this cost penalty will likely be modest compared with the anticipated benefits of small‐scale operation such as increased opportunity to use existing infrastructure, easier plant siting and supply chain establishment, and lower total investment required.

Biofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningVol. 19(1)
Dartmouth College (US), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research, Center for Bioenergy Innovation
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Biofuel production and bioconversion
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.