FACTORS DETERMINING THE SEVERITY OF ANOSOGNOSIA IN PATIENTS WITH DEPENDENCE ON SYNTHETIC CATHINONES ON AN EXAMPLE OF THE “NON-ACCEPTANCE OF SOBRIETY” SCALE

This article presents an analysis of the relationship between sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological characteristics and the lack of readiness for sobriety in patients with synthetic cathinone addiction. Patient motivation to stop using psychoactive substances plays a critical role in treatment success. Anosognosia, or lack of awareness of one’s condition, complicates the formation of this motivation. The lack of readiness for sobriety is one key element of anosognosia. Seventy patients with synthetic cathinone addiction were examined. The methods used included: 1) clinical and psychological methods with a specially developed registration form; 2) experimental psychological methods, including the “Anosognosia in Addiction” questionnaire (R. D. Ilyuk et al., 2020), the “Addiction Severity Index” (EuropASI — Russian version) (T. McLellan, D. Karise, 1979), the “Rehabilitation Potential Assessment Scale” (T. N. Dudko et al., 2006), the “Personality Differential” (Factor O) (E. M. Bazhin, A. M. Etkind, 1983), and the “Family Environment Scale” (S. Yu. Kupriyanov, 1985). Correlation and regression analyses identified sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological factors influencing the degree of rejection of sobriety. The results allowed for the identification of risk group criteria and psychotherapeutic targets for specialists addressing anosognosia in patients with synthetic cathinone addiction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PERSONALITY IN A CHANGING WORLD HEALTH ADAPTATION DEVELOPMENT
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23888/humj2024123229-238
Primary Topic
Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FACTORS DETERMINING THE SEVERITY OF ANOSOGNOSIA IN PATIENTS WITH DEPENDENCE ON SYNTHETIC CATHINONES ON AN EXAMPLE OF THE “NON-ACCEPTANCE OF SOBRIETY” SCALE

E. A. Granovskaya
PERSONALITY IN A CHANGING WORLD HEALTH ADAPTATION DEVELOPMENT
Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
article

FACTORS DETERMINING THE SEVERITY OF ANOSOGNOSIA IN PATIENTS WITH DEPENDENCE ON SYNTHETIC CATHINONES ON AN EXAMPLE OF THE “NON-ACCEPTANCE OF SOBRIETY” SCALE

E. A. Granovskaya
article en

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the relationship between sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological characteristics and the lack of readiness for sobriety in patients with synthetic cathinone addiction. Patient motivation to stop using psychoactive substances plays a critical role in treatment success. Anosognosia, or lack of awareness of one’s condition, complicates the formation of this motivation. The lack of readiness for sobriety is one key element of anosognosia. Seventy patients with synthetic cathinone addiction were examined. The methods used included: 1) clinical and psychological methods with a specially developed registration form; 2) experimental psychological methods, including the “Anosognosia in Addiction” questionnaire (R. D. Ilyuk et al., 2020), the “Addiction Severity Index” (EuropASI — Russian version) (T. McLellan, D. Karise, 1979), the “Rehabilitation Potential Assessment Scale” (T. N. Dudko et al., 2006), the “Personality Differential” (Factor O) (E. M. Bazhin, A. M. Etkind, 1983), and the “Family Environment Scale” (S. Yu. Kupriyanov, 1985). Correlation and regression analyses identified sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological factors influencing the degree of rejection of sobriety. The results allowed for the identification of risk group criteria and psychotherapeutic targets for specialists addressing anosognosia in patients with synthetic cathinone addiction.

PERSONALITY IN A CHANGING WORLD HEALTH ADAPTATION DEVELOPMENTVol. 12(3 (46))
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.