The Right to a Healthy Environment in the Democratic Republic of Congo: An Anthropocentric Conception

For several decades now, the destruction of the environment has been at the root of major human health problems. With the holding of two major United Nations conferences around the 1970s, the issue became alarming. It was realised that human beings could only live in a healthy environment. The inclusion of the environment of goods that can be protected has over time preoccupied States. The issue has been a success, and today there is no longer any controversy over the need to protect the environment. The intention of the decision-makers was not to protect the environment, but rather man through his environment. This policy is an anthropocentric emanation. As this was not enough, the United Nations went a step further by recognising that for the sake of human life man has the right to live in a healthy environment devoid of any risk to his health. The Democratic Republic of Congo has endorsed this option by constitutionalising this right. This constitutionalisation allows us to question its effects and its animus. It is around this question that we will focus on.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scholars Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36347/sjahss.2024.v12i10.003
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Right to a Healthy Environment in the Democratic Republic of Congo: An Anthropocentric Conception

Gabriel Ajabu Mastaki
Scholars Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences
Environmental law and policy
article

The Right to a Healthy Environment in the Democratic Republic of Congo: An Anthropocentric Conception

Gabriel Ajabu Mastaki
article en

Abstract

For several decades now, the destruction of the environment has been at the root of major human health problems. With the holding of two major United Nations conferences around the 1970s, the issue became alarming. It was realised that human beings could only live in a healthy environment. The inclusion of the environment of goods that can be protected has over time preoccupied States. The issue has been a success, and today there is no longer any controversy over the need to protect the environment. The intention of the decision-makers was not to protect the environment, but rather man through his environment. This policy is an anthropocentric emanation. As this was not enough, the United Nations went a step further by recognising that for the sake of human life man has the right to live in a healthy environment devoid of any risk to his health. The Democratic Republic of Congo has endorsed this option by constitutionalising this right. This constitutionalisation allows us to question its effects and its animus. It is around this question that we will focus on.

Scholars Journal of Arts Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 12(10)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Right to a Healthy Environment in the Democratic Republic of Congo: An Anthropocentric Conception — Gabriel Ajabu Mastaki · Scholars Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS