Defending Against AI Threats with a User-Centric Trustworthiness Assessment Framework

This study critically examines the trustworthiness of widely used AI applications, focusing on their integration into daily life, often without users fully understanding the risks or how these threats might affect them. As AI apps become more accessible, users tend to trust them due to their convenience and usability, frequently overlooking critical issues such as security, privacy, and ethics. To address this gap, we introduce a user-centric framework that enables individuals to assess the trustworthiness of AI applications based on their own experiences and perceptions. The framework evaluates several dimensions—transparency, security, privacy, ethics, and compliance—while also aiming to raise awareness and bring the topic of AI trustworthiness into public dialogue. By analyzing AI threats, real-world incidents, and strategies for mitigating the risks posed by AI apps, this study contributes to the ongoing discussions on AI safety and trust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8110142
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defending Against AI Threats with a User-Centric Trustworthiness Assessment Framework

Efi Kafali, Theodoros Semertzidis, Davy Preuveneers, Petros Daras
2 citations
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.05
article

Defending Against AI Threats with a User-Centric Trustworthiness Assessment Framework

Efi Kafali, Theodoros Semertzidis, Davy Preuveneers, Petros Daras
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study critically examines the trustworthiness of widely used AI applications, focusing on their integration into daily life, often without users fully understanding the risks or how these threats might affect them. As AI apps become more accessible, users tend to trust them due to their convenience and usability, frequently overlooking critical issues such as security, privacy, and ethics. To address this gap, we introduce a user-centric framework that enables individuals to assess the trustworthiness of AI applications based on their own experiences and perceptions. The framework evaluates several dimensions—transparency, security, privacy, ethics, and compliance—while also aiming to raise awareness and bring the topic of AI trustworthiness into public dialogue. By analyzing AI threats, real-world incidents, and strategies for mitigating the risks posed by AI apps, this study contributes to the ongoing discussions on AI safety and trust.

Big Data and Cognitive ComputingVol. 8(11)
Information Technologies Institute (GR), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (GR), KU Leuven (BE)
KU Leuven, Vlaamse regering
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.