Public Perceptions of the Administrative Values Tradeoff: Bureaucratic and Democratic Ethos

ABSTRACT Scholarly debate over bureaucratic and democratic values has been one of the fundamental questions in the field of public administration. Despite a volume of theoretical discussions, we know little about how the general public cares about these two sets of administrative values in practice. This research fills the gap in the literature by investigating the public's views on four administrative values: effectiveness and efficiency, as well as equity and participation. We also test whether there is a tradeoff between bureaucratic and democratic values. We conducted a vignette experiment using the context of US nursing homes where different administrative values (effectiveness, efficiency, equity, and participation) serve as treatment manipulations. Our findings suggest that the public considers different values in assessing public organizations, and that they recognize the trade‐off between efficiency and participation. The study has broad implications for our understanding of ethical frameworks of public administration, namely bureaucratic and democratic ethos.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.13041
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Perceptions of the Administrative Values Tradeoff: Bureaucratic and Democratic Ethos

Kenneth J. Meier, Suyeon Jo
10 citations
Public Administration
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
11.29
article

Public Perceptions of the Administrative Values Tradeoff: Bureaucratic and Democratic Ethos

Kenneth J. Meier, Suyeon Jo
article en
10 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Scholarly debate over bureaucratic and democratic values has been one of the fundamental questions in the field of public administration. Despite a volume of theoretical discussions, we know little about how the general public cares about these two sets of administrative values in practice. This research fills the gap in the literature by investigating the public's views on four administrative values: effectiveness and efficiency, as well as equity and participation. We also test whether there is a tradeoff between bureaucratic and democratic values. We conducted a vignette experiment using the context of US nursing homes where different administrative values (effectiveness, efficiency, equity, and participation) serve as treatment manipulations. Our findings suggest that the public considers different values in assessing public organizations, and that they recognize the trade‐off between efficiency and participation. The study has broad implications for our understanding of ethical frameworks of public administration, namely bureaucratic and democratic ethos.

Public AdministrationVol. 103(2)
Leiden University (NL), University of Arizona (US), American University (US), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
11.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.