No agreement between expected phoropter Risley prism and prism bar fusional vergences in a prospective cross-sectional study of African school children

<i>Purpose:</i> To determine the agreement between phoropter Risley prism and prism bar fusional vergence amplitudes in a normative group of school-aged children, aged 8 to 17 years. <i>Method:</i> This prospective cross-sectional study utilized multistage sampling to recruit participants with normal binocular vision. Horizontal fusional vergence amplitudes were measured at distance and near using the phoropter with Risley prisms and the prism bar. <i>Result:</i> The study included 422 normal participants (48.1% male, 51.9% female) with a mean age of 12.39 ± 1.94 years. There were significant differences in the base-in break, base-in recovery, base-out blur, base-out break, and base-out recovery at distance and near between phoropter Risley prism and prism bar fusional vergences (p < 0.05); amplitudes for phoropter Risley prism were higher than that for prism bar. Their mean differences were clinically meaningful except for base-in recovery at distance; however, there was no level of agreement on Bland Altman analysis. <i>Conclusion:</i> Fusional vergence amplitudes measured with the phoropter Risley prism and prism bar should not be considered interchangeable in African schoolchildren.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strabismus
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2024.2419004
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No agreement between expected phoropter Risley prism and prism bar fusional vergences in a prospective cross-sectional study of African school children

Carl Halladay Abraham, Emmanuel Aniekan Essien, Stephen Ocansey, Enyam Komla Amewuho Morny et al.
Strabismus
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

No agreement between expected phoropter Risley prism and prism bar fusional vergences in a prospective cross-sectional study of African school children

Carl Halladay Abraham, Emmanuel Aniekan Essien, Stephen Ocansey, Enyam Komla Amewuho Morny, Charles Darko‐Takyi, Sandra Owusu, Kwame Osei, Kumi Owusu Boakye, Edward Okyere Kyeretwie, Ebenezer Manu, Victoria Yirrah
article en

Abstract

<i>Purpose:</i> To determine the agreement between phoropter Risley prism and prism bar fusional vergence amplitudes in a normative group of school-aged children, aged 8 to 17 years. <i>Method:</i> This prospective cross-sectional study utilized multistage sampling to recruit participants with normal binocular vision. Horizontal fusional vergence amplitudes were measured at distance and near using the phoropter with Risley prisms and the prism bar. <i>Result:</i> The study included 422 normal participants (48.1% male, 51.9% female) with a mean age of 12.39 ± 1.94 years. There were significant differences in the base-in break, base-in recovery, base-out blur, base-out break, and base-out recovery at distance and near between phoropter Risley prism and prism bar fusional vergences (p < 0.05); amplitudes for phoropter Risley prism were higher than that for prism bar. Their mean differences were clinically meaningful except for base-in recovery at distance; however, there was no level of agreement on Bland Altman analysis. <i>Conclusion:</i> Fusional vergence amplitudes measured with the phoropter Risley prism and prism bar should not be considered interchangeable in African schoolchildren.

StrabismusVol. 33(2)
University of Cape Coast (GH), Seventh day Adventist Hospital (IN), Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (GH), Vision Eye Institute (AU), Universitas Merdeka Malang (ID), Novindiet Clinic (IR), Sunyani Technical University (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.