What happens to the “social” in psychosocial? Exploring epistemic practices and therapeutic culture in teacher education

This paper examines the role of the psychosocial as an influential epistemic category in the context of a globalised therapeutic culture. Drawing on empirical data from fieldwork conducted at a teacher education institution in Norway, we conceptualise the psychosocial as epistemic practice and analyse three interrelated social levels: the individual level, concerned with teachers’ performance as social caretakers; the community level, characterised by a diagnosing gaze on individual pupils; and the societal level, understood as structural threats to well-being. Our study suggests that these epistemic practices favour psychological diagnosis and individual protection over shared knowledge and broader social awareness. • The psychosocial as an epistemic category is characterised by its therapeutic emotional style. • The emotional style blends therapeutic care with instrumental reasoning and popular psychology. • Emotional epistemologies in teacher education are seen as a response to the challenges and risks of late modern society. • Psychosocial practices favour psychological diagnosis and individual protection over open negotiation and knowledge sharing. • Psychosocial practices prioritise internal resilience and disregard social knowledge as central to well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching and Teacher Education
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104818
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What happens to the “social” in psychosocial? Exploring epistemic practices and therapeutic culture in teacher education

Øyvind Førland Standal, Gro Mathias
2 citations
Teaching and Teacher Education
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
4.19
article

What happens to the “social” in psychosocial? Exploring epistemic practices and therapeutic culture in teacher education

Øyvind Førland Standal, Gro Mathias
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the role of the psychosocial as an influential epistemic category in the context of a globalised therapeutic culture. Drawing on empirical data from fieldwork conducted at a teacher education institution in Norway, we conceptualise the psychosocial as epistemic practice and analyse three interrelated social levels: the individual level, concerned with teachers’ performance as social caretakers; the community level, characterised by a diagnosing gaze on individual pupils; and the societal level, understood as structural threats to well-being. Our study suggests that these epistemic practices favour psychological diagnosis and individual protection over shared knowledge and broader social awareness. • The psychosocial as an epistemic category is characterised by its therapeutic emotional style. • The emotional style blends therapeutic care with instrumental reasoning and popular psychology. • Emotional epistemologies in teacher education are seen as a response to the challenges and risks of late modern society. • Psychosocial practices favour psychological diagnosis and individual protection over open negotiation and knowledge sharing. • Psychosocial practices prioritise internal resilience and disregard social knowledge as central to well-being.

Teaching and Teacher EducationVol. 153
Metropolitan University (RS), Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
4.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.