<sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT in the evaluation of gliomas: comparison with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced MRI

<b><i>Rationale:</i></b> This study compared <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) for glioma imaging, classification, and recurrence detection and explored PET parameters and molecular pathological profiles. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Between June 2020 and June 2024, we prospectively enrolled patients with space-occupying lesions in the brain or previously treated gliomas. All patients underwent sequential CE-MRI, <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed based on a reference standard, and PET parameters were analysed for correlations with WHO grading and molecular characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Forty-eight patients (median age, 51 years; 32 men) with 40 confirmed gliomas were enrolled. For primary tumour diagnosis, the sensitivity of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT was equivalent to CE-MRI (95% vs. 100%, <i>P</i> = 0.99) and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT (95% vs. 77%, <i>P</i> = 0.13). <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 uptake was higher in grade IV than in grade I-II gliomas (5.03 vs. 1.14, <i>P</i> = 0.02). <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT showed significantly higher maximum standardized uptake value and tumour-to-background ratio (TBR) in recurrent tumours than in treatment-related changes and demonstrated favourable sensitivity and specificity for detecting recurrent gliomas, though not significantly superior to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT (sensitivity: 100% vs. 85%, <i>P</i> = 0.48; specificity: 100% vs. 80%, <i>P</i> = 0.99) and CE-MRI (sensitivity: 100% vs. 100%, <i>P</i> = NA; specificity: 100% vs. 40%, <i>P</i> = 0.25). Glial fibrillary acidic protein-mutant gliomas exhibited higher <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 uptake than wild-type gliomas. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT outperformed <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and CE-MRI in diagnosing glioma recurrence, although the results were not statistically significant. For primary glioma diagnosis, <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, despite having a better TBR, did not surpass <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and CE-MRI in terms of sensitivity and specificity. However, <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT is superior to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG for visualizing and classifying gliomas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theranostics
Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.103399
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT in the evaluation of gliomas: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced MRI

Haojun Chen, Dan Ruan, Yizhen Pang, Liang Zhao et al.
17 citations
Theranostics
Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
4.80
article

68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT in the evaluation of gliomas: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced MRI

Haojun Chen, Dan Ruan, Yizhen Pang, Liang Zhao, Long Sun, Changjing Zuo, Chengkun Han, Jiayu Cai, Lingyu Yu, Guowei Tan, Xiaobo Qu, Zhanxiang Wang, Jian‐Ping Sun
article en
17 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Rationale:</i></b> This study compared <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) for glioma imaging, classification, and recurrence detection and explored PET parameters and molecular pathological profiles. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Between June 2020 and June 2024, we prospectively enrolled patients with space-occupying lesions in the brain or previously treated gliomas. All patients underwent sequential CE-MRI, <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed based on a reference standard, and PET parameters were analysed for correlations with WHO grading and molecular characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Forty-eight patients (median age, 51 years; 32 men) with 40 confirmed gliomas were enrolled. For primary tumour diagnosis, the sensitivity of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT was equivalent to CE-MRI (95% vs. 100%, <i>P</i> = 0.99) and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT (95% vs. 77%, <i>P</i> = 0.13). <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 uptake was higher in grade IV than in grade I-II gliomas (5.03 vs. 1.14, <i>P</i> = 0.02). <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT showed significantly higher maximum standardized uptake value and tumour-to-background ratio (TBR) in recurrent tumours than in treatment-related changes and demonstrated favourable sensitivity and specificity for detecting recurrent gliomas, though not significantly superior to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT (sensitivity: 100% vs. 85%, <i>P</i> = 0.48; specificity: 100% vs. 80%, <i>P</i> = 0.99) and CE-MRI (sensitivity: 100% vs. 100%, <i>P</i> = NA; specificity: 100% vs. 40%, <i>P</i> = 0.25). Glial fibrillary acidic protein-mutant gliomas exhibited higher <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 uptake than wild-type gliomas. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT outperformed <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and CE-MRI in diagnosing glioma recurrence, although the results were not statistically significant. For primary glioma diagnosis, <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, despite having a better TBR, did not surpass <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and CE-MRI in terms of sensitivity and specificity. However, <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT is superior to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG for visualizing and classifying gliomas.

TheranosticsVol. 14(18)
Second Military Medical University (CN), Xiamen University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University (CN), Xiamen Institute of Rare-earth Materials (CN), Changhai Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
4.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.