Validation of NEXUS Chest Criteria in Chest Trauma Patients - A Prospective Observational Study

Background: Traumatic injuries significantly impact morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs, particularly in developing countries like India. Thoracic injuries contribute to 20-50% of trauma-related deaths. The NEXUS chest criteria aim to reduce unnecessary radiological imaging, thereby saving time, reducing costs, and minimizing radiation exposure. Aim: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of NEXUS chest criteria in predicting traumatic thoracic injuries in an Indian context. Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of NEXUS chest criteria. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective observational study was conducted at KIMSHEALTH Thiruvananthapuram from March 2021 to July 2022, involving 122 trauma patients aged over 18 years. Physicians recorded the presence of NEXUS Chest 7 clinical criteria before viewing radiographic results. Method: The NEXUS chest criteria were applied to the study population, and results were compared with chest x-ray findings to determine sensitivity. Results: Among 122 patients (mean age 42.90 years, 63.1% male), 53.3% injuries were due to RTA. Chest x-ray was indicated in 53 patients, revealing thoracic injuries in 43. The NEXUS chest criteria showed a sensitivity of 90.7%, specificity of 97.5%, positive predictive value of 50%, and negative predictive value of 100%. The diagnostic accuracy was 97.5%. Conclusion: NEXUS Chest criteria effectively reduce the need for chest imaging in blunt trauma patients over 18 years old.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Published
2024-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21275/mr241019124146
Primary Topic
Trauma Management and Diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of NEXUS Chest Criteria in Chest Trauma Patients - A Prospective Observational Study

Arun Kumar M, Shih‐Chi Ku, Sisira Sunil, John P Mani et al.
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Trauma Management and Diagnosis
article

Validation of NEXUS Chest Criteria in Chest Trauma Patients - A Prospective Observational Study

Arun Kumar M, Shih‐Chi Ku, Sisira Sunil, John P Mani, Hashim Abdul Latheef
article en

Abstract

Background: Traumatic injuries significantly impact morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs, particularly in developing countries like India. Thoracic injuries contribute to 20-50% of trauma-related deaths. The NEXUS chest criteria aim to reduce unnecessary radiological imaging, thereby saving time, reducing costs, and minimizing radiation exposure. Aim: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of NEXUS chest criteria in predicting traumatic thoracic injuries in an Indian context. Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of NEXUS chest criteria. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective observational study was conducted at KIMSHEALTH Thiruvananthapuram from March 2021 to July 2022, involving 122 trauma patients aged over 18 years. Physicians recorded the presence of NEXUS Chest 7 clinical criteria before viewing radiographic results. Method: The NEXUS chest criteria were applied to the study population, and results were compared with chest x-ray findings to determine sensitivity. Results: Among 122 patients (mean age 42.90 years, 63.1% male), 53.3% injuries were due to RTA. Chest x-ray was indicated in 53 patients, revealing thoracic injuries in 43. The NEXUS chest criteria showed a sensitivity of 90.7%, specificity of 97.5%, positive predictive value of 50%, and negative predictive value of 100%. The diagnostic accuracy was 97.5%. Conclusion: NEXUS Chest criteria effectively reduce the need for chest imaging in blunt trauma patients over 18 years old.

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)Vol. 13(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Trauma Management and Diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.