Dilemmas in Diagnosis and Management of Temporal Bone Fractures and Their Sequelae

Objective(s): The objective of this study was to report our experience with a series of patients with temporal bone fractures from 2019 to 2023 and to evaluate the dilemmas in diagnosing the extent of their ontological injuries through a narrative review of the literature focusing on the classifications of temporal bone fractures. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from the electronic medical records of patients who presented to the emergency department and were diagnosed with temporal bone fractures using computed tomograms of the head and temporal bone between September 2019 and March 2023. A total of 117 patients were included in the study. Demographic data, fracture classification, mechanism of injury, and presence and/or repair of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, facial nerve injury (both immediate and delayed), and hearing loss (both immediate and delayed) were also recorded. Results: In total, 49.5% of our cohort were between the ages of 19 and 39, and the majority (66%) were males. The primary cause of the trauma was falls in 41% of patients, followed by motor vehicle accidents (29%), and 70% had a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) between 13 and 15 at presentation. In total, 92.3% of temporal bone fractures did not involve the otic capsule, and 79.3% were longitudinal fractures. In total, 89% of the CSF leaks were seen in patients with longitudinal fractures. Similarly, 70% of facial nerve deficits were seen in patients with longitudinal and otic capsule-sparing fractures. Conclusion: Diagnosis of facial asymmetry and hearing loss in patients with TBFs can be challenging in acute care settings but was less challenging in our cohort due to patients presenting with good GCSs. Dilemmas in clinical evaluation in the acute care setting are due to poor GCSs, heterogeneity of documentation of injuries, and classification of TBFs. Implementation of universal protocols with homogeneity in the documentation and classification of temporal bone fractures may help improve patient care and prediction of outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Therapeutics
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/therapeutics1020007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dilemmas in Diagnosis and Management of Temporal Bone Fractures and Their Sequelae

Taylor Powell, Cameron Robicheaux, Gauri Mankekar, Rhian E. Germany
1 citations
Therapeutics
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
0.37
article

Dilemmas in Diagnosis and Management of Temporal Bone Fractures and Their Sequelae

Taylor Powell, Cameron Robicheaux, Gauri Mankekar, Rhian E. Germany
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective(s): The objective of this study was to report our experience with a series of patients with temporal bone fractures from 2019 to 2023 and to evaluate the dilemmas in diagnosing the extent of their ontological injuries through a narrative review of the literature focusing on the classifications of temporal bone fractures. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from the electronic medical records of patients who presented to the emergency department and were diagnosed with temporal bone fractures using computed tomograms of the head and temporal bone between September 2019 and March 2023. A total of 117 patients were included in the study. Demographic data, fracture classification, mechanism of injury, and presence and/or repair of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, facial nerve injury (both immediate and delayed), and hearing loss (both immediate and delayed) were also recorded. Results: In total, 49.5% of our cohort were between the ages of 19 and 39, and the majority (66%) were males. The primary cause of the trauma was falls in 41% of patients, followed by motor vehicle accidents (29%), and 70% had a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) between 13 and 15 at presentation. In total, 92.3% of temporal bone fractures did not involve the otic capsule, and 79.3% were longitudinal fractures. In total, 89% of the CSF leaks were seen in patients with longitudinal fractures. Similarly, 70% of facial nerve deficits were seen in patients with longitudinal and otic capsule-sparing fractures. Conclusion: Diagnosis of facial asymmetry and hearing loss in patients with TBFs can be challenging in acute care settings but was less challenging in our cohort due to patients presenting with good GCSs. Dilemmas in clinical evaluation in the acute care setting are due to poor GCSs, heterogeneity of documentation of injuries, and classification of TBFs. Implementation of universal protocols with homogeneity in the documentation and classification of temporal bone fractures may help improve patient care and prediction of outcomes.

TherapeuticsVol. 1(2)
Louisiana State University in Shreveport (US), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), Willis-Knighton Cancer Center (US), Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.