How Does the Critical Torus Instability Height Vary with the Solar Cycle?

Abstract The ideal magnetohydrodynamic torus instability can drive the eruption of coronal mass ejections. The critical threshold of magnetic field strength decay for the onset of the torus instability occurs at different heights in different solar active regions, and understanding this variation could therefore improve space weather prediction. In this work, we aim to find out how the critical torus instability height evolves throughout the solar activity cycle. We study a significant subset of Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) and Michelson Doppler Imager Space-Weather HMI Active Region Patches (SHARPs and SMARPs) from 1996 to 2023, totaling 21,584 magnetograms from 4436 unique active-region patches. For each magnetogram, we compute the critical height averaged across the main polarity inversion line, the total unsigned magnetic flux, and the separation between the positive and negative magnetic polarities. We find the critical height in active regions varies with the solar cycle, with higher (lower) average critical heights observed around solar maximum (minimum). We conclude that this is because the critical height is proportional to the separation between opposite magnetic polarities, which in turn is proportional to the total magnetic flux in a region, and more magnetic regions with larger fluxes and larger sizes are observed at solar maximum. This result is noteworthy because, despite the higher critical heights, more coronal mass ejections are observed around solar maximum than at solar minimum.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad77a0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
High-pressure geophysics and materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Does the Critical Torus Instability Height Vary with the Solar Cycle?

Alexander W. James, David R. Williams, L. van Driel‐Gesztelyi, Lucie M. Green et al.
1 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
High-pressure geophysics and materials
0.53
article

How Does the Critical Torus Instability Height Vary with the Solar Cycle?

Alexander W. James, David R. Williams, L. van Driel‐Gesztelyi, Lucie M. Green, G. Barnes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The ideal magnetohydrodynamic torus instability can drive the eruption of coronal mass ejections. The critical threshold of magnetic field strength decay for the onset of the torus instability occurs at different heights in different solar active regions, and understanding this variation could therefore improve space weather prediction. In this work, we aim to find out how the critical torus instability height evolves throughout the solar activity cycle. We study a significant subset of Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) and Michelson Doppler Imager Space-Weather HMI Active Region Patches (SHARPs and SMARPs) from 1996 to 2023, totaling 21,584 magnetograms from 4436 unique active-region patches. For each magnetogram, we compute the critical height averaged across the main polarity inversion line, the total unsigned magnetic flux, and the separation between the positive and negative magnetic polarities. We find the critical height in active regions varies with the solar cycle, with higher (lower) average critical heights observed around solar maximum (minimum). We conclude that this is because the critical height is proportional to the separation between opposite magnetic polarities, which in turn is proportional to the total magnetic flux in a region, and more magnetic regions with larger fluxes and larger sizes are observed at solar maximum. This result is noteworthy because, despite the higher critical heights, more coronal mass ejections are observed around solar maximum than at solar minimum.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 975(1)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, European Space Agency, Science and Technology Facilities Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
High-pressure geophysics and materials
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.