A measurement scale for material deprivation: A model‐based approach

The prevailing practice of defining classes of material deprivation based on the raw sum of a relatively small number of binary items has obvious advantages in terms of communication and ease of use. Do two people with the same raw score always have the same level of deprivation? This paper examines the methodological foundations of the raw score, comparing classical test theory with model‐based test theory such as Rasch measurement and item response theories. After discussing the merits and limitations of the different approaches, the paper legitimizes the raw score when the assumptions of the Rasch model are met. Based on the analytical procedure of the Rasch model and using the pre‐Covid data from the Survey on Income and Living Conditions, the paper also suggests how to develop a European scale for measuring material deprivation that ensures comparability across European countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Income and Wealth
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12716
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A measurement scale for material deprivation: A model‐based approach

Sara Viviani, Maria Grazia Pittau, Roberto Zelli, Alessio Farcomeni
3 citations
Review of Income and Wealth
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
3.40
article

A measurement scale for material deprivation: A model‐based approach

Sara Viviani, Maria Grazia Pittau, Roberto Zelli, Alessio Farcomeni
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The prevailing practice of defining classes of material deprivation based on the raw sum of a relatively small number of binary items has obvious advantages in terms of communication and ease of use. Do two people with the same raw score always have the same level of deprivation? This paper examines the methodological foundations of the raw score, comparing classical test theory with model‐based test theory such as Rasch measurement and item response theories. After discussing the merits and limitations of the different approaches, the paper legitimizes the raw score when the assumptions of the Rasch model are met. Based on the analytical procedure of the Rasch model and using the pre‐Covid data from the Survey on Income and Living Conditions, the paper also suggests how to develop a European scale for measuring material deprivation that ensures comparability across European countries.

Review of Income and WealthVol. 71(1)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT), University of Cagliari (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A measurement scale for material deprivation: A model‐based approach — Sara Viviani, Maria Grazia Pittau, et al. · Review of Income and Wealth (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS