Person as an object of nomination in the institutional discourse of photographers: semantic and pragmatic aspects

The article analyzes the semantics of photo-participants’ nominations, the principles and reasons for their distribution in Russian and English versions of the photographers’ institutional discourse. We assume that the analysis of photo-participants’ nominations is relevant, because it reveals the socioprofessional and status-role relations of the communication participants by means of creating units using the associative ability of words. Moreover, it indicates emotional-evaluative relations within the institution of the photo activity participants and a linguo-creative potential of the communicants. The result of the study is a classification of nominations, based on the denotative macrocomponent, which made it possible to identify groups of photography subjects, demonstrating 1) complementary signs of professionalism and social status; 2) certain brands of photographic equipment; 3) certain events, objects and locations. The photographed people are represented by a group of nominations classified according to their professional criteria, events or emotions. The connotative macrocomponent indicates a socio-professional confrontation expressed by a dismissive, derogatory or abusive seme. The mechanisms of semantic transformation, when creating nominations for participants in the photo process, are diverse and actualize images, both obvious and difficult to identify and interpret. The appearance of the photographers and other participants' nominations in the photographic process is due to extralinguistic (to give designations for persons performing new activities) and intralinguistic factors (inconsistency of the existing nomination with the requirements of communicants).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philology and Culture
Published
2024-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26907/2782-4756-2024-77-3-77-83
Primary Topic
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Person as an object of nomination in the institutional discourse of photographers: semantic and pragmatic aspects

Masha Mikhailova, Ruzilia Irekovna Vakhitova, Gulnara Ilduganova
Philology and Culture
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
article

Person as an object of nomination in the institutional discourse of photographers: semantic and pragmatic aspects

Masha Mikhailova, Ruzilia Irekovna Vakhitova, Gulnara Ilduganova
article en

Abstract

The article analyzes the semantics of photo-participants’ nominations, the principles and reasons for their distribution in Russian and English versions of the photographers’ institutional discourse. We assume that the analysis of photo-participants’ nominations is relevant, because it reveals the socioprofessional and status-role relations of the communication participants by means of creating units using the associative ability of words. Moreover, it indicates emotional-evaluative relations within the institution of the photo activity participants and a linguo-creative potential of the communicants. The result of the study is a classification of nominations, based on the denotative macrocomponent, which made it possible to identify groups of photography subjects, demonstrating 1) complementary signs of professionalism and social status; 2) certain brands of photographic equipment; 3) certain events, objects and locations. The photographed people are represented by a group of nominations classified according to their professional criteria, events or emotions. The connotative macrocomponent indicates a socio-professional confrontation expressed by a dismissive, derogatory or abusive seme. The mechanisms of semantic transformation, when creating nominations for participants in the photo process, are diverse and actualize images, both obvious and difficult to identify and interpret. The appearance of the photographers and other participants' nominations in the photographic process is due to extralinguistic (to give designations for persons performing new activities) and intralinguistic factors (inconsistency of the existing nomination with the requirements of communicants).

Philology and Culture(3)
Kazan Federal University (RU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Person as an object of nomination in the institutional discourse of photographers: semantic and pragmatic aspects — Masha Mikhailova, Ruzilia Irekovna Vakhitova, et al. · Philology and Culture (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS