Participant Diversity in Stroke‐Related Medical Device Trials: Historical Context and Ongoing Challenges

Despite an acknowledgment of the ethical and clinical importance of recruiting diverse populations into clinical trials, there is a continued underenrollment of patients with diverse demographic characteristics within the field of neurology and more specifically, in stroke-related device trials. Efforts on the part of the US Congress, the National Institutes of Health, the US Food and Drug Administration, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services over the past several decades have attempted to increase trial participant diversity with varying success. This historical context provides an important lens for analyzing diversity proposals and their bearing on device trials in the field of stroke neurology. Despite economic and logistical challenges, recruitment of appropriately diverse clinical trial populations through policy change and community engagement is critical to continuing to advance health equity goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.124.001383
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Participant Diversity in Stroke‐Related Medical Device Trials: Historical Context and Ongoing Challenges

Karen Orjuela, Nicole R. Gonzales, John D. Carroll, Mary E. Fuhlbrigge
Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

Participant Diversity in Stroke‐Related Medical Device Trials: Historical Context and Ongoing Challenges

Karen Orjuela, Nicole R. Gonzales, John D. Carroll, Mary E. Fuhlbrigge
article en

Abstract

Despite an acknowledgment of the ethical and clinical importance of recruiting diverse populations into clinical trials, there is a continued underenrollment of patients with diverse demographic characteristics within the field of neurology and more specifically, in stroke-related device trials. Efforts on the part of the US Congress, the National Institutes of Health, the US Food and Drug Administration, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services over the past several decades have attempted to increase trial participant diversity with varying success. This historical context provides an important lens for analyzing diversity proposals and their bearing on device trials in the field of stroke neurology. Despite economic and logistical challenges, recruitment of appropriately diverse clinical trial populations through policy change and community engagement is critical to continuing to advance health equity goals.

Stroke Vascular and Interventional NeurologyVol. 4(6)
University of Colorado System (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Participant Diversity in Stroke‐Related Medical Device Trials: Historical Context and Ongoing Challenges — Karen Orjuela, Nicole R. Gonzales, et al. · Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS