Study on Interstage Pressure Equalization of Differential Multi-Stage Finger Seal with Structural Design, Flow and Heat Transfer Characteristics

To effectively address the issue of premature failure caused by the unbalanced distribution of pressure drops between the stages of a traditional two-stage finger seal, this study proposes a method to improve the pressure drop balance by increasing the protection height of the second stage back plate. We established a new numerical calculation model for a two-stage finger seal, based on the porous media model. After verifying the precision of the model, we conducted a numerical analysis to examine the impact of the protection height of the second stage back plate on the flow and heat transfer characteristics of the two-stage finger seal. We then conducted a differentiated structural design for each stage of the two-stage finger seal. The research results are as follows: the pressure drop at the second stage of the traditional two-stage finger seal exceeds that of the first stage; when the protection height of the second stage back plate of the traditional two-stage finger seal is increased from 1.5 mm to 1.57 mm, forming a two-stage pressure equalizing finger seal structure, the pressure drop between the two stages is balanced, but the leakage is greater than that of the traditional two-stage finger seal; a grate seal structure was arranged between the first and second stages of the two-stage pressure equalizing finger seal to form a two-stage pressure equalizing finger seal with grate teeth, which exhibits significantly lower leakage compared to the two-stage pressure equalizing finger seal. However, the proportion of pressure drop at the first and second stages of the two-stage pressure equalizing finger seal is 36.8% and 42.1%, respectively, while the grate tooth stage accounts for 21.1%, resulting in an imbalanced pressure drop once again. Increasing the protection height of the second stage back plate in the two-stage pressure equalizing finger seal with grate teeth to 1.6 mm results in a 37.5% pressure drop at the first and second stages, and a 25% pressure drop at the grate tooth stage. The two-stage finger seal balances the pressure drop and matches the leakage of the traditional two-stage finger seal. The maximum temperatures of the first and second stages of the finger seal are 0.7% lower and 2.6% higher compared to the traditional two-stage finger seal. This suggests that a differential multi-stage finger seal is the optimal structure.