A Historical Perspective and Update on Robotic Mitral Valve Surgery

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Minimally invasive techniques for mitral valve repair have evolved over the past thirty years and include mini-thoracotomies and the robotic platform. This study provides a historical perspective on minimally invasive mitral valve approaches and evaluates long-term outcomes of a large series of robotic mitral valve repairs. <b>Methods</b>: A single-institution, prospectively maintained registry was used to evaluate robotic mitral valve repairs performed by four surgeons from 2005 to 2023. There were 1412 robotic mitral valve repairs performed during this time and stratified by the first 120 and subsequent patients. We evaluated operative outcomes and freedom from more than 2+ mitral regurgitation at five years as well as ten-year survival. <b>Results</b>: Of the 1412 robotic mitral valve repairs performed, 93.6% (<i>n</i> = 1322) were for degenerative disease. Compared to the first 120 patients, the subsequent patients had a significant reduction in cross-clamp time (112 (IQR = 103-130) versus 75 (IQR = 65-88) min) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (153.5 (IQR = 134.5-177.5) versus 116 (IQR = 103-136) min), and all with <i>p</i> < 0.01. The majority of patients had posterior leaflet prolapse (65.6%, <i>n</i> = 926). The repair rate was 98.1%, <i>n</i> = 1385. Survival at ten-year follow-up for the patients included in the first 120 procedures was 91.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 86.4-96.6%) versus 92.8% (95% CI = 91.7-93.9%) for the patients who were in the latter group, <i>p</i> = 0.58. Freedom from >2+ mitral regurgitation at 5 years was 97.0% (95% CI = 95.3-98.7%) for the patients in the first 120 procedures and 92.7% (95% CI = 91.5-93.9%), <i>p</i> = 0.22, for those in the latter group. <b>Conclusions</b>: The robotic platform offers an excellent durable repair for mitral regurgitation in our experience of over 1400 patients. The robotic platform for mitral valve repair offers a teachable and safe approach to mitral valve disease for patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216375
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Historical Perspective and Update on Robotic Mitral Valve Surgery

Amy Roach, Danny Ramzy, Dominic Emerson, George W. Gill et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
0.40
article

A Historical Perspective and Update on Robotic Mitral Valve Surgery

Amy Roach, Danny Ramzy, Dominic Emerson, George W. Gill, Joanna Chikwe, Wen Cheng, Alfredo Trento
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Minimally invasive techniques for mitral valve repair have evolved over the past thirty years and include mini-thoracotomies and the robotic platform. This study provides a historical perspective on minimally invasive mitral valve approaches and evaluates long-term outcomes of a large series of robotic mitral valve repairs. <b>Methods</b>: A single-institution, prospectively maintained registry was used to evaluate robotic mitral valve repairs performed by four surgeons from 2005 to 2023. There were 1412 robotic mitral valve repairs performed during this time and stratified by the first 120 and subsequent patients. We evaluated operative outcomes and freedom from more than 2+ mitral regurgitation at five years as well as ten-year survival. <b>Results</b>: Of the 1412 robotic mitral valve repairs performed, 93.6% (<i>n</i> = 1322) were for degenerative disease. Compared to the first 120 patients, the subsequent patients had a significant reduction in cross-clamp time (112 (IQR = 103-130) versus 75 (IQR = 65-88) min) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (153.5 (IQR = 134.5-177.5) versus 116 (IQR = 103-136) min), and all with <i>p</i> < 0.01. The majority of patients had posterior leaflet prolapse (65.6%, <i>n</i> = 926). The repair rate was 98.1%, <i>n</i> = 1385. Survival at ten-year follow-up for the patients included in the first 120 procedures was 91.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 86.4-96.6%) versus 92.8% (95% CI = 91.7-93.9%) for the patients who were in the latter group, <i>p</i> = 0.58. Freedom from >2+ mitral regurgitation at 5 years was 97.0% (95% CI = 95.3-98.7%) for the patients in the first 120 procedures and 92.7% (95% CI = 91.5-93.9%), <i>p</i> = 0.22, for those in the latter group. <b>Conclusions</b>: The robotic platform offers an excellent durable repair for mitral regurgitation in our experience of over 1400 patients. The robotic platform for mitral valve repair offers a teachable and safe approach to mitral valve disease for patients.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(21)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.