Classical Liberalism’s Evolutionary Foundations Reconsidered

The economist and Nobelist Friedrich (F. A.) Hayek argues that classical liberal principles of individual liberty, free markets, and spontaneous order are rooted in evolved aspects of human nature. To establish a natural-law proof supporting this argument, Hayek borrowed from Charles Darwin’s controversial theory of natural selection occurring at the group level. Some scholars challenge Hayek’s reliance upon Darwinian theory, and yet the modern literature in economics, history, biology, paleontology, sociobiology, physical sciences, and nonlinear complex adaptive systems supports the conceptual basis of Hayek’s evolutionary approach. It also suggests that the civil and economic strands of classical liberalism and libertarianism represent a distinct phase within an evolutionary progression, although not the telos that Hayek claimed. This article examines Hayek’s argument, its criticisms and justifications, and alternative scientific and linguistic theories explaining the adaptive evolution of social and economic systems. The implications of this examination transcend the bounds of Hayek’s argument.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Libertarian Studies
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35297/001c.124371
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classical Liberalism’s Evolutionary Foundations Reconsidered

James A. Montanye
Journal of Libertarian Studies
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Classical Liberalism’s Evolutionary Foundations Reconsidered

James A. Montanye
article en

Abstract

The economist and Nobelist Friedrich (F. A.) Hayek argues that classical liberal principles of individual liberty, free markets, and spontaneous order are rooted in evolved aspects of human nature. To establish a natural-law proof supporting this argument, Hayek borrowed from Charles Darwin’s controversial theory of natural selection occurring at the group level. Some scholars challenge Hayek’s reliance upon Darwinian theory, and yet the modern literature in economics, history, biology, paleontology, sociobiology, physical sciences, and nonlinear complex adaptive systems supports the conceptual basis of Hayek’s evolutionary approach. It also suggests that the civil and economic strands of classical liberalism and libertarianism represent a distinct phase within an evolutionary progression, although not the telos that Hayek claimed. This article examines Hayek’s argument, its criticisms and justifications, and alternative scientific and linguistic theories explaining the adaptive evolution of social and economic systems. The implications of this examination transcend the bounds of Hayek’s argument.

Journal of Libertarian StudiesVol. 28(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Classical Liberalism’s Evolutionary Foundations Reconsidered — James A. Montanye · Journal of Libertarian Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS